May License Plate Report

May’s haul: Wyoming, Wisconsin, Delaware, and Utah.

For some reason, multiple sightings often follow hard on the first: I swear I’ve seen three different Utahs and two different Delawares.

May also brought the advance guard of cutesy-poo plates on out-of-state cars: VINYUD, MVI 66, that sort of thing. There will be more, many more, before summer’s over. I’m not counting them.

I might get myself a cutesy-poo plate if I hadn’t inherited a four-digit number plate from my mother. #6531 actually comes from the other side of the family: my mother got it when my paternal grandfather’s widow moved to New Hampshire, and now I can’t remember whether it originally belonged to paternal grandfather’s brother or paternal grandfather’s uncle. My paternal grandparents were divorced by the time paternal grandfather died, which was seven years before I was born, so my knowledge of the Sturgis side of the family is sketchy.

In Massachusetts, letting a low-number plate exit the family is sufficient grounds for feud or disinheritance, though no jury would likely buy it as a justification for bodily harm. I’m not averse to feuds and I have no rich relatives, but #6531 will stay within the family when I croak, give up driving, or move out of state, whichever comes first.

No, it’s not snowing. This is just the first photo I found of Malvina Forester’s license plate.

Posted in license plates | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sad

I’m sad to report that little ducky and (probably) his mama are no more.

Mama, papa, and little ducky together on Saturday

My next-door neighbors went over to see the ducks yesterday morning. When they returned, they reported that they had seen no ducks at all. Very unusual. I went over to check it out: by the time I got there, papa duck and a couple of the hens were emerging from under the back deck. I looked under the deck, walked around the house and peered under shrubbery, circled the two sheds and the fenced-in garden — no sign of mama or little.

No sign of a struggle either. That was some comfort.

When I returned at T-Beau’s supper time, a little after five, little ducky was back in the enclosure. No sign of mama. Not good.

Around sundown, when there was still plenty of light, I went back to close the hens in their little henhouse — they put themselves to bed at the appropriate hour but are unable to shut the door themselves — and shut the enclosure gate. Still no mama. Papa, who spends nearly all of his time either outside the enclosure or on top of it, was inside with little ducky. I’d been advised that with mama gone, keeping baby warm enough was an issue. Maybe papa’s presence would help? I shut them in together.

Little ducky’s last morning

This morning I went over at 6:30 to let everyone out and feed whoever needed feeding. Little ducky was OK but, I thought, awfully alone. More restless than usual, with no mama to settle under. At about quarter to eight, I stopped by with Trav as we headed out on our long a.m. walk. Trav was fascinated by papa duck, who was in his accustomed place on top of the enclosure, and by the two hens inside it. A patch of yellow fluff caught my eye in the green, green grass between the enclosure and the house.

Little ducky was dead. I picked up the little body and put it on the deck railing. I saw no signs of injury; could it just have died, perhaps of the fear and stress of being suddenly alone? No way of knowing. With mama gone and no foster mamas around, its chances of surviving to adult duckhood probably weren’t very good.

RIP, little ducky

After Trav and I returned from our walk, I went back to the neighbors’. With a garden shovel I dug a little grave at the edge of the scrub near the enclosure gate. The hens clustered around, snatching up bugs and a worm exposed by the disturbed earth. I shooed them away and laid little ducky to rest.

No more Ducky TV, T-Beau, for you or the rest of us. I’m grateful to have been part of your all-too-brief life, little ducky.

 

 

 

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, work | Tagged | 1 Comment

Awesome

Two weeks ago Travvy and I headed north for a Rally Obedience trial in Raymond, New Hampshire. When we left home, Raymond, New Hampshire, wasn’t on my psychic map. From the moment I passed exit 32 on I-495, I was in “Here Be Dragons” territory. As I drew close to Lowell (eek! big unfamiliar city reaching out to discombobulate wanderers and lure them into Faerie!), my gut churned and my mind skittered: Had I missed the exit for I-93?  Maybe my map was lying and I-93 doesn’t intersect I-495 at all? Maybe I-93 has moved since my map was published?

True, the map was at least 20 years old, but the mind that’s grounded in familiar territory doesn’t seriously entertain the possibility that an interstate highway has changed location. Once Malvina Forester’s tires were spinning us rapidly northward on I-93, I could breathe normally for a few miles before I started worrying about finding New Hampshire state route 101, which according to my map would enable us to bypass Manchester (eek! big unfamiliar city . . . !).

Long story short: I found SR 101, and then SR 125, which our motel was on (family-owned! not a chain!), and then a supermarket where I could buy a six-pack of Sierra Nevada pale ale. (You know you’re not in Massachusetts anymore when you can buy beer and wine in a supermarket.)

Bo-Gee dog training center, the Rally venue, wasn’t on my psychic map either. All I knew was that the indoor crating space was limited and reserved “for volunteers’ quiet dogs,” and that there was no indoor plumbing. I wasn’t a volunteer, Travvy is not quiet, and I’d brought two gallon jugs of water for us to drink. I found the place right where the directions said it would be, in a small shopping center off SR 107, and set up in the parking area along with most other competitors.

On this trip Trav and I were also venturing into new territory as a team. APDT Rally has three levels, each more demanding than the last. Since finishing our Level 2 title last fall, we’ve been learning the challenging Level 3 exercises. We weren’t quite there, but I decided to give Level 3 a try anyway. My “wildest dreams” goal for the weekend was to come home with one Q (qualifying run) at Level 3 and to finish our ARCHX (APDT Rally CHampion eXcellent) title. The ARCHX requires that a team qualify in Level 1 and Level 2 at the same trial (a double Q) a total of ten times. To finish we’d have to double Q at three of the weekend’s four trials. (I know: This is confusing. What we call “a trial” actually consists of four distinct trials, each with its own schedule of classes.)

The Send Over Jump sign from APDT Rally’s Level 3

Another long story short: We did it. We finished our ARCHX! We NQed (didn’t qualify) in our first Level 3 attempt but our run wasn’t bad at all, and the second time we Qed!! Our run was a little ragged, not least because the course included both of our two weakest exercises: down on recall (you leave dog, turn and call the dog to you, then signal the dog to lie down before he gets to you), and send over jump (see graphic: you’re standing on one little dot, your dog is on the other, and your dog has to come to you the long way, i.e., over the jump). I fudged it by standing too close to the jump and lost points for that, but if Trav had bypassed the jump, it would have been an NQ. It worked. I was (still am!) thrilled.

Trav with his weekend loot. That’s Malvina Forester in the background.

Two of the weekend’s high points, though, aren’t hanging on the wall. In presenting ribbons for a Level 1 class, the Sunday judge noted that many of the novice competitors were getting dinged (losing points) for tight leashes. (Level 1 is on leash, but the leash is supposed to hang loose at all times.) She singled out two teams for the newbies to watch as examples of good leash handling: one was Travvy and me. Later she told me: “When you get more confidence, you guys are going to be awesome.

Alaskan malamutes aren’t known for their trainability, or their suitability for obedience. Now that Trav and I can consistently go into the ring and turn in a pretty good performance, what I hear is usually along the lines of “Wow, you’re doing well considering you’ve got a malamute.” I’m just as bad: I pat myself on the back for how far we’ve come, a very novice handler and a fairly difficult dog, while secretly dreading that Trav is going to have a stress-related meltdown and jump out of the ring, the way he did several times during our terrible winter of 2011.

This judge wasn’t just telling us that we’re doing well; she was telling us that we can do better. More than that, she was taking it for granted that we should aim higher and that we have the potential to be awesome.

I hadn’t realized how parched my expectations were getting till they sprang back to life.

Posted in dogs | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Little Ducky

This morning Susie Farmerette (NOT) hit on the bright idea of shutting the hens out of the hen yard for the day, thereby turning it into a duck yard.

Duckling with mama

Three hours later I returned, point-and-shoot in my hip pocket. Eureka! Mama and baby ducky had emerged from their cave.

Finally I could remove the pet carrier (which mama has barely left for about a month), dump it, rinse it, and bed it down with fresh straw. Four pairs of beady hen eyes watched every step of the process. I think mama duck likes having the hens on the other side of the chickenwire.

Little ducky is actually eating the growth mash I bought at SBS the other day. It seems to like having the hens at a safe distance. (I don’t know nuthin’ about sexing ducklings, so “it” is the best I can do. Don’t want to be promoting gender confusion in little ducky.) Papa duck is keeping an eye out.

So is T-Beau the goldendoodle. He’s riveted by Ducky TV. (Little ducky is small yellow fluffball directly in front of mama.)

T-Beau watches Ducky TV

 

Posted in dogs, Martha's Vineyard, work | Tagged , | 6 Comments

My Menagerie

Daddy duck in a favorite pose. Mama duck is roosting in the pet carrier below.

For ten days or so I’m looking after a neighbor’s dog. Along with the dog come two handsome ginger cats, four hens, and two ducks, the female of whom is sitting on an egg. The ducks are a recent acquisition. My neighbors don’t know exactly how long mama duck has been sitting on the egg. The egg may, in other words, hatch while they’re gone.

Fortunately my neighbors are of the que sera, sera variety. They don’t know what mama will do if/when the duckling appears, or how the resident hens will react. The resident hens are apparently beyond their egg-laying years. Mr. Neighbor has allowed as how he wouldn’t mind terribly if Travvy dispatched one or more to Hen Heaven. I have not told Travvy that.

The ducks, Ms. Neighbor told me, really like bread. Since I was away last weekend and I baked today, I had a thick past-its-prime (but still edible) crust left over from my last loaf. When I went to feed T-Beau (whose name is also spelled Thibeaux, Tebo, and a few other ways) the dog, I tore it into chunks and added it to the two pans of cracked corn left out for the fowl. The hens were chowing down when I left. Maybe the ducks will get some too. Maybe not.

T-Beau the goldendoodle

T-Beau is a goldendoodle, a big, sweet, goofy guy. He’s a little leery of Trav, but they get along fine, so I’ve been taking T-Beau on some of our walks. T-Beau is 10 and slowing down somewhat. Travvy is 4 and “slowing down” isn’t on his horizon yet. When he plays zoomies on his Flexi lead, I’m hard pressed to keep the lead from wrapping around T-Beau. We take shorter, somewhat less brisk walks when T-Beau comes along. Since the neighbors’ house isn’t far away, I can drop by sans Trav and spend some quality time with the big guy.

Love-Bug on a mission

The two cats are golden too. When Trav and I walk, drive, or bike by, they like to sit in the middle of the dirt road and think, I’m here, you’re on a leash, nyah nyah nyah. The big cat is Cricket. The smaller one is Love-Bug. I haven’t told Trav that I’m looking after Those Cats, but I think he smells cat on my clothes when I come home.

Cricket and hen

T-Beau, Love-Bug, Cricket, the (nameless) hens, and the (also nameless) ducks live in an idyllic Peaceable Kingdom. Throw Trav into the mix and you’d have something like the twister that whirled Dorothy off to Oz. Sometimes I wish I had a dog that was into laid-back coexistence with other species. Most of the time I’m glad I have Trav. He keeps me on my toes.

Don’t knock, just come on in

Speaking of toes — there’s no way I’d walk around here barefoot. Free-range chickens don’t clean up after themselves, and no one is following after them with pooper-scoopers. Having encountered these chickens on the road, where they seem oblivious to the fact that only a thin strip of webbing separates them from a salivating malamute, I knew they were bold. I was warned that they’ll come into the house if you let them. One afternoon I arrived to find that the front door had blown open. I searched the house diligently to make sure that no hen had taken up residence in a human’s bedroom.

Whenever I take on a new animal-sitting gig, the first 24 hours are the most nerve-racking. What didn’t the humans tell me? What if I show up in the morning and everyone’s dead? I was much relieved last Friday evening when I discovered that yes, indeed, the hens had gathered themselves into the coop as sundown approached. Just as Ms. Neighbor said they would. I opened the side door and counted: one, two, three, four. Whew.

True, I’m still a little anxious about that duck egg, but hey, que sera, sera, right? I can’t control the neighborhood’s skunks and raccoons.

Update! Update!

May 21, before 7 a.m. The egg hatched last night. There’s now a fuzzy yellow little duckling in the pet carrier with mama. Mama came out of the carrier to eat some of the cracked corn I put down this morning — the first time I’ve seen her out of her little cave. Papa duck is overhead being vigilant. It sounds like he’s hyperventilating, but these may be his Keep away! noises. The hens were eating the cracked corn in the coop (where mama, baby, and the pet carrier are — it’s maybe four by five feet, not very big) and paying no apparent attention to the new arrival. T-Beau, on the other side of the chickenwire enclosure, was most interested. Both cats were inside the house eating at the time.

Posted in dogs, Martha's Vineyard, work | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Writing About MV

When I moved to Martha’s Vineyard in the summer of 1985, I’d saved enough money to take a frugal year off from my frugal real life and work on the novel I’d started a few years before, tentatively titled Coming Around. The novel’s protagonist, Jamie, leaves her job at a university press to take a job on the Vineyard, managing the small horse farm where she spent many summers growing up.

My first three years here I barely looked at the novel. I wrote mostly poetry. I continued to write essays and reviews for feminist, lesbian, and gay publications, and after I went to work for the Martha’s Vineyard Times (1987 or 1988), I started writing theater reviews, occasional feature stories about the local arts scene, and even a few op-eds. In the early 1990s I started experimenting with one-act plays and short stories. One of the latter, “Deer Out of Season” (1994), became the springboard for The Mud of the Place, my first and so far only novel. I didn’t get down to serious work on Mud until 1998.

In retrospect, this makes perfect sense. Novels require plenty of compost. In 1985, having paid short visits to the Vineyard for 20 years, I didn’t know diddly about the place, and most of what I did know was shallow. Compost? Nowhere close. Poems are more like snapshots, first impressions that can be shaped into images. They grow pretty well in thin, sandy soil with only so-so drainage.

When the editors of Talking Writing, a very good e-zine that features all kinds of writers writing about all kinds of writing, asked if I’d contribute an essay to their forthcoming issue on images and words, my “yes!” was immediate. I’d been itching for years to explore the challenges of writing about a place that most people know only from images in the mainstream media. I especially wanted to write about how my background as a reviewer and editor of fantasy/science fiction had helped me do it.

“World-Building Martha’s Vineyard” was just launched into cyberspace. Check it out. If you’re interested in writing of any kind, a subscription to Talking Writing is worth way more than they’re charging for it, which is nothing.

P.S. I never finished Coming Around and probably never will, but it had a major impact on my life. Running through my head when I made the crazy decision to move to Martha’s Vineyard (only for a year, mind you) was “If Jamie can do it, so can I.” I grew up with horses and belonged to a 4-H horse club through junior high and high school, but when I arrived on the island, horses were in my distant past. I assumed they were going to stay there. By the end of the 1990s, I had my first horse in 30 years. I’m pretty sure Jamie and her friends had a hand in that too.

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, writing | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

About Those Election Results

Trav and I are hanging out at a motel in Epping, New Hampshire, resting up for an
APDT Rally trial that starts tomorrow. For some background on Rally, see “Rally Off-Island,” my post about a trial we went to last month. This means that I won’t be able to attend a couple of events tomorrow morning. What a total drag that I can’t be two places at once.

The first event is a meeting of Martha’s Vineyard Democrats. I invariably vote Democratic when I vote at all, mainly because I’m either too young or lived in the wrong states to have voted for the likes of Ed Brooke, Mark Hatfield, Charles Percy, and Margaret Chase Smith.  I’ve never been involved in party politics, and I don’t aspire to start now, but (this being an election year) our state senator, Dan Wolf, and our state rep, Tim Madden, are going to be there. They’re both Democrats.

One of the signs that hung in front of Tilton Rentall (at the blinker) during election week in Oak Bluffs. Maggie MacCarty was the graphic artist.

What I’m dying to know is (a) what they think about the overwhelming “no” the voters of five island towns gave to the roundabout — Aquinnah, the island’s smallest town and the last to vote, on Wednesday weighed in with a whopping 81% no vote; (b) what, if anything, they plan to do about it; and (c) if they plan to do nothing, which is what they have done so far, why we should support them, vote for them, or generally encourage them to think of themselves as our representatives.

That meeting takes place at the Howes House, home of the Up-Island Council on Aging and frequent venue for town government and other political meetings. Immediately afterward, Representative Madden and Senator Wolf will cross the rutted dirt parking lot to the West Tisbury library. There they will ceremoniously receive the news that the annual town meetings of all six island towns urged that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission be overturned. True, this decision sucks. Equally true, the vote at the West Tisbury ATM meant diddly squat; it was the last item on the warrant, and those who hadn’t left already were pulling their jackets on and saying good night to whoever they were sitting next to. The discussion was minimal, the vote totally symbolic. The situation was similar, I’m told, in other towns.

Another sign. It’s true, too.

The Honorables Wolf and Madden were among the co-sponsors of the anti-Citizens United bill on Beacon Hill. How honorable of them to take a principled stand on a totally symbolic bill that will cost them nothing. What wonderful evidence in support of “snowmobiles in Christiantown syndrome” — the notion that the amount of time, energy, and general hullaballoo devoted to an issue is in inverse proportion to its importance.

If I were there, I’d love to step out of the gooey congratulatory crowd, present the Honorables with the results of the roundabout referendum votes, and ask what they plan to do about it. If the Honorables didn’t have to toddle off to Nantucket immediately after the ceremony, I would point out that plenty of threats to democracy in this country have nothing to do with Citizens United or the 1% that the Occupy people like to rant about.

So before I left the island this morning, I wrote a short bit for Mathea Morais of Martha’s Vineyard Patch, who had asked several of us anti-roundabouters for our comments about the referdum votes — “about what you think it means or you think it should mean for the Island and the way things get decided here.” Well, I should have been copyediting the manuscript that’s due in New York at the end of next week, but instead I wrote this:

The election results confirmed in spades what I learned when I was out collecting anti-roundabout signatures: popular opinion is overwhelmingly against this thing. Since the percentage against was well over 70% in five island towns (over 80% in Aquinnah), I think it’s a safe bet that the result in Oak Bluffs would have been similar if the OB selectmen had allowed the town’s citizens to vote by secret ballot.

If it were up to Vineyard voters, there would be no roundabout at the blinker. Unfortunately, it’s not up to us. It’s up to the state — to MassDOT and, ultimately, the governor. I wish I could say I was confident they’d do the right thing, but I’m not. Martha’s Vineyard doesn’t even have the electoral clout to influence our state senator and our state rep. Clout is what matters, and I’m afraid MassDOT and Greenman Petersen Inc. (GPI), the contractor, have much more clout at the State House than we do.

Me and my hat. Photographer: Jonathan Wiggs, Boston Globe.

I didn’t get involved in fighting the roundabout till early last summer. Like many other Vineyarders, I thought the project was dead till it came roaring back in April 2011. We’ve made a lot of headway since then, but all the while I’ve been asking “How did this boondoggle get this far? At what point did the Vineyard lose control of the process?”

As I understand it, we lost control of the process when the Oak Bluffs board of selectmen signed the contract giving the state financial and managerial control of the project. Most likely that contract would never have been drawn up, never mind signed, if the elected and appointed members of the Martha’s Vineyard Commission (MVC) had been paying closer attention and asking more rigorous questions in the period from 2004 through 2006.

Popular opinion was mobilized against the roundabout in those years — and it was totally blown off. In 2011 and 2012 it’s been blown off again. What’s the message here? That there’s no point in getting involved. No matter how well you do your research and present your arguments, no matter how many people you’ve got on your side, you’re not going to be heard.

And guess what? The ones who aren’t listening aren’t the so-called “1%.” Many of them are our very own elected officials, and some of them live right up the road from us. For me the big lesson here is that we need to wake up, believe we can make a difference, then pull together to make our voices heard.

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Rumor Control

The rumor you haven’t heard is true: This afternoon I took out nomination papers to run for the Martha’s Vineyard Commission (MVC) in the November election. By the end of the day I’d also registered with the State Ethics Commission, a prelude to filing the statement of financial interests that is required of any candidate for public office, and also of all public officials and “designated public employees,” which seems to mean those in major policy-making positions.

There are plenty of hoops to jump through, but the bottom line is that only 10 certified signatures of registered voters are required to get on the ballot. Since signatures have to be certified by the clerk of the voter’s town, it’s easiest to obtain all the signatures in one town, ideally one’s own. I do not anticipate that this will be difficult.

MVC seats are not exactly hotly contested, but the selection criteria complicate matters somewhat. The MVC has 21 members. Five are appointed by the governor; of these five, only one can vote, and these five are rarely seen at meetings. One is appointed by the board of selectmen in each of the island’s six towns, and one is appointed by the county. The other nine are elected by island voters, but each town must be represented by at least one commissioner and no town can be represented by more than two. This means that the #3 vote-getter from a particular town loses even if s/he outpolls candidates from other towns.

West Tisbury, being a civic-minded town, often fields more candidates than can be elected. Of the town’s two current elected commissioners, one is a longtimer with major name recognition: pretty much unbeatable if she decides to run again. The other, though, is a relative newcomer who voted for the roundabout every chance he got. Since the island electorate is running close to 75% against the roundabout, this makes him vulnerable. In addition, I’ve heard tell of at least one other person who’s taken out nomination papers in my town, and since the filing deadline isn’t till July 31, there may be more.

My campaign manager

So why am I running for the Martha’s Vineyard Commission? Or, more accurately, why am I seriously considering running for the Martha’s Vineyard Commission? I attended a bunch of MVC meetings and hearings last year in connection with the roundabout. Despite some bright spots, I wasn’t impressed with the quality of the discussion. The more I learned about what happened, or rather didn’t happen, in the years leading up to those meetings, the angrier I got. Did no one on the MVC notice that the MVC staff was running the show? The tail was wagging the dog and the dog didn’t bark?

Well, when I stopped sputtering, I had to admit that I’m possessed of some skills that might be useful to the MVC. I can do research, I can process information, I can (if I work at it) see both the big picture and the pesky details at the same time. I can listen. I’m not afraid to speak. I’m also a renter, a constituency underrepresented on just about every elected body on Martha’s Vineyard.

“If not me, who?” is what it comes down to. We’ll see what happens next.

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , , , | 11 Comments

Those Signs, Again

A week ago I blogged about “Those Signs.” Among other things, I wrote that “they’d be at home anywhere: on a suburban golf course, alongside an interstate. The ones I’ve seen so far sit uneasily on the landscape, sharp-angled against the contours of the land . . .”

A friend tipped me off to the sign at the West Tisbury library. She doesn’t like the signs, but she does like this one. So do I. Unlike the other ones I’ve seen or heard about, this sign has a conversation going with its setting. The other messages make me groan. This one makes me grin. Here it is:

Above the entrance to the periodical room, West Tisbury library

As I left the library after taking the picture, a fellow was coming in, camera in hand. He asked me where the sign was — you know, the signs that have been in the papers? I gave directions: turn left, when you get to the main desk turn right and look up. He thanked me.

I suspect he’s on a treasure hunt, and that he’s not the only one. The signs are scheduled to come down today or tomorrow. Maybe the conversations about them will continue. I’m listening.

Posted in Martha's Vineyard | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Mayday & Mary

I. May 5, 1971

Just over a month shy of my 20th birthday, I got busted on the Capitol steps along with about 1,200 other people. It was the third day of the Mayday demonstrations against the war in Indochina, in which I’d decided not to get involved because I thought the strategy — to block key commuting routes during rush hour by sitting down in them — was flaky, not to mention testosterone-crazed and counterproductive.

For me, as part of the D.C. antiwar movement, Mayday was a logistical question even more than a political one. Tens of thousands of people were going to be pouring into the city. They needed places to crash, cheap or free food, and local information. We knew how to organize that, and we did. On Monday, May 3, more than 7,000 people were arrested on the streets of Our Nation’s Capital. Many were doing nothing more political than going to work; a few, I heard, were there to demonstrate in support of the war. Stand with two other people on a street corner and you might get busted for illegal assembly. The streets, and before long the Georgetown University campus, reeked of tear gas.

In short, before long it didn’t matter whether you supported the Mayday Tribe’s tactics. What mattered was the official overreaction. Early Wednesday morning, May 5, we heard a reliable rumor that several members of Congress were going to address demonstrators at the Capitol. A friend and I took a break from housing and feeding demonstrators and headed downtown to check it out.

Thanks to Google, I just found this in my old Bloggery: from “Normal” (July 29, 2008). I added the representatives’ first names but that’s it.

Neither of us intended to get arrested. Not only were we in the middle of finals, we were involved in feeding and housing demonstrators on campus. The couple thousand or so people who rallied at the Capitol were angry but orderly. Four congressmen — Ron Dellums, Bella Abzug, Charles Rangel, and Parren Mitchell, bless ’em all — came out to address us. Then, for reasons known only to their leaders, the police decided that it was no longer lawful (a variety of normal) to sit on the Capitol steps, even though we were there at the invitation of the congressmen and were listening to them speak. In a very few, fast-flowing minutes my idea of what was normal, expected, and acceptable underwent a sea-change. I crossed the line that separated lawful from unlawful; not only that, I grabbed my friend’s hand and pulled him along with me. By that point what I did wasn’t extraordinary at all; it was the normal, expected, and acceptable thing to do.

When we got out of jail, it was close to midnight on May 7, which happened to be my friend’s birthday. In the days that followed, my French professor refused to let me take the final because I didn’t have shoes on; I flunked the course with an A– average. Then a bunch of us occupied the university president’s office because he’d invited the cops on campus to expel the demonstrators housed there and many of their belongings had gone missing. The president expelled us outright but commuted this to disciplinary probation when someone reminded him that expulsion could be appealed.

That fall I decided I’d had it with Georgetown, and shortly thereafter the University of Pennsylvania accepted me as a transfer student, even though I was on both academic and disciplinary probation at the time.

II. Happy birthday, Mary

Yeah, “pint-sized dynamo” is a cliché, but how else to describe the late Mary Payne (1932-1996)? She could barely see over the dashboard of whatever car she was driving — in the years I knew her, it was usually a red VW Rabbit — but she was a force. Determined, passionate, infuriating, manipulative as hell, and wise.

Today is her birthday.

Mary, who spent summers here growing up, moved here year-round in the late 1960s. In 1968 she founded Island Theatre Workshop (ITW). ITW’s first program was the Children’s Theatre, but it quickly expanded to include a theater program for teenagers and eventually a community theater for everyone who wanted to participate. She was a one-woman press gang for the dramatic arts: many people didn’t know they were dying to act, stage-manage, paint sets, or whatever till Mary shanghaied them off the streets.

I moved to the island in mid-1985, met Mary that November, and before 1986 was well under way, I’d been duly shanghaied — by this stocky little whirlwind who turned out to be the only other lesbian feminist pagan on Martha’s Vineyard. Mary didn’t just draft me into the theater (after the initial panic, I was a willing conscript), she pulled me into her solar system, where a dozen or so people — most with some theater connection — were already orbiting. Single new arrivals don’t last long on Martha’s Vineyard if they don’t become part of some family-like support network. Would I have stuck around if Mary hadn’t drawn me into hers? Probably not.

In those very early years Mary pointed me toward various odd jobs that helped me support myself. Occasionally she hired me herself, though she was chronically short of cash; when she was really broke, I’d drag her down to the Vineyard Gazette office to help collate the paper on Friday mornings. One of those gigs turned into a poem, “The Lapsed Archivist Attends a Housecleaning.”  The you in the poem is Mary, and of course I’m the lapsed archivist. Mary and her partner, Nancy Luedeman (1920–2010), were the only Vineyarders I knew who had any inkling of the world I had come from, who recognized the same poets, writers, and musicians that I did. No wonder I felt so at home in their (usually chaotic) house.

By 1988 my employment situation had stabilized somewhat: I was chambermaiding at the Lambert’s Cove Inn and proofreading for the Martha’s Vineyard Times. Before long, I was also reviewing theater, of which there was a lot in those days. I’d plenty of experience reviewing books, but reviewing theater on Martha’s Vineyard was different. A book you can read, reread, mark up, and read again; a theatrical production flows by you and all you have at the end are your notes, your memories, and maybe a copy of the script. I’d also worked with many of the people whose work I was reviewing, and I could run into any of them on Main Street or at the post office.

Not to mention — the unspoken rule of reviewing on Martha’s Vineyard was that thou shalt not say anything negative about anyone, ever. It took me a while to catch on to this, and after I did I broke the rule consciously instead of unconsciously. Some theater people liked it. Others didn’t. Mary was one of the ones who didn’t. She saw reviewers as part of a production’s PR staff. I thought a review ought to give newspaper readers an idea of whether a show was worth plunking down $10 or $15 for, and recognize worthy performances and tech work when they appeared — as they often did.

Well, to put it politely, our ways diverged as a result. After I left the Times in October 1993, I reinvolved myself in theater, as an actor and playwright as well as a stage manager — but this time at the Vineyard Playhouse, then under Eileen Wilson’s capable leadership. Mary and I were on cordial terms again by the time she died so suddenly in October 1996: we barely had time to digest her cancer diagnosis than she was gone. I still miss her.

This poem was inspired by one of my early stage-managing jobs for Mary. It’s one of the best things I’ve ever written:
“The Assistant Stage Manager Addresses Her Broom After a Performance of Macbeth

Posted in Martha's Vineyard | Tagged , , , , , , , | 6 Comments