Recognition

Laundromat sign with sidekick

Laundromat sign with sidekick

I do my laundry at the Airport Laundromat. When the laundry hamper is high and the clean underwear supply approaching nil — about every three weeks — I start watching the weather for a good drying day. Then off I go to the county airport. (It’s not called the Airport Laundromat for nothing.)

While the washers wash, Travvy and I go for our morning walk. Animal Health Care, a vet clinic and kennel, is nearby. As we cross the lawn, one dog out back usually starts barking. This sets the others off. Trav loves it. The grass, trees, and bushes smell like dogs he’s never met. He likes that too.

There are plenty of places to walk around the Airport Business Park, as it’s called. Over the last few months, we noted the progress of a small building going up alongside Flatbread Pizza (formerly Nectars and, before that, the Hot Tin Roof, among other things). Turned out to be a new liquor store, technically in Edgartown but wonderfully close to the border of my dry town.

no trespassing

Warning sign at building site. No enforcers were in sight, so we ignored it.

Earlier this month, we discovered the scenic site that I blogged about in “NIMBY Delight.” It’s not hard to get off the beaten path at the Airport Business Park.

Sometimes we even stroll through the airport terminal. Travvy woos enthusiastically at the people waiting in line, of whom there are rarely more than a handful. The terminal was built in the late 1990s with July and August in mind, but for ten months of the year it’s neither July nor August so the place usually feels like an abandoned movie set. A fellow who works for one of the car-rental agencies has a Siberian husky. He converses with Trav and shows me dog photos on his smart phone.

The TSA people have never tried to stop us. Our passing through is probably the high point of their day. I wouldn’t mind having a job that required me to do nothing all day, but only if it let me do nothing sitting down.

The Airport Laundromat, July 2011. It looks just like that now, except the storm door is up and usually shut.

The Airport Laundromat, July 2011. It looks just like that now, except the storm door is up and usually shut.

In my D.C. days, the neighborhood laundromats were bustling places. Women bustled in and out and conversations swirled around me; I could either eavesdrop or join in, depending on my mood. The Airport Laundromat is not like that. Even in summer I’m often the only one there, and since Trav and I are out walking, I’m not really there either.

Most people drop their laundry off and pick it up later. In summer B&Bs and others drop off their sheets and towels. (From my years as a chambermaid at the Lambert’s Cove Inn [ca. 1988–1991], I can testify that dirty linen does tend to pile up when you’re in the hospitality business.)

The women who work at the Airport Laundromat are Brazilians. They speak Portuguese while they work, folding laundry and troubleshooting the washers and dryers. One of them rarely smiles, even when talking with her co-workers and friends. They change my $20s for smaller bills so I’m not stuck with 80 quarters from the change machine.  They’re courteous and efficient, but the laundromat they work at and the one I do my laundry at are not the same place. Our psychic maps of Martha’s Vineyard are very different. I’ve often wondered if they overlap at all.

Monday afternoon I took a comforter in to be laundered. Compared to the hour it would have taken to do it myself, not to mention the line-drying time, $18 was a good deal. Tuesday afternoon I stopped by to pick it up. As I walked through the front door, the woman who never smiles was coming in the side door with my comforter, folded and protected by a plastic bag, in her arms.

I beamed, absurdly delighted. “You recognized my car,” I said.

She smiled back and said yes, she did.

I wrote a check, gathered up my clean comforter, and left, smiling to myself.

Driving home I recollected an incident from my first winter here, 1985/86. My winter rental was near Five Corners, and I was frequently in and out of the Black Dog Bakery. My morning usual was coffee and a raisin bran muffin. My afternoon usual was coffee and a peanut butter chocolate chip cookie. From late fall into mid-spring, the waiting time was not long. As the weather got warmer, the lines got longer.

One afternoon, it reached all the way to the door. I stepped in, assessed the situation, and was about to give up. One of the counter workers caught my eye and nodded. I made my way to the cashier, bypassing the long line. My coffee and peanut butter chocolate chip cookie were waiting for me on the counter. I paid for them and left.

I’d been recognized. I was a regular. Maybe I belonged on Martha’s Vineyard after all.

Posted in Martha's Vineyard | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

November Color

Has this been a spectacular fall for color, or am I just paying closer attention? Friends on the Vineyard and elsewhere in southern New England have been marveling as well, so I know it’s not just me.

This morning the oaks in my neighborhood are battened down for winter. There’s a little ice in Trav’s outside water dish. Here’s a belated tribute to November color and other signs of fall.

A guy and his chainsaw

A guy and his chainsaw

20131014 log stack 2

Logs from a tree that was too close to the driveway

It’s easy to see the truth of the adage “Wood warms you twice.” I get to watch my neighbors saw and split and stack. My little heater uses propane.

The driveway looks downright wintry . . .

driveway

. . . but as I walk along it, I see the Bradford pear glowing in the middle of my neighbors’ lawn.

bradford pear 1

Two Bradford pears nearby are smaller but just as bright.

horsehead laundryNovember laundry is mostly somber, but the Japanese maple near the clothesline isn’t.

maple & sillSpeaking of Japanese maples, this is what I see out my window every morning when I open the curtains and pull up the shade. Worth getting out of bed for, yes?

Here it is again, from the outside, eclipsed by a big fir, with my second-floor apartment in the background.

maple eclipsed

In November, the greens look greener — at least when they’re not being upstaged by Japanese maples and Bradford pears.

greenmoss In deep winter, brambles stand out. They’re the only green in the scrubby undergrowth. In November I don’t notice them till they wrap around my legs.

 

 

Trav and I walk around this field several times a week, 52 weeks a year. It’s gone quiet now — but isn’t the sky blue?

SMF field

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, outdoors | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Twelve Years a Slave

I saw Steve McQueen’s excellent film last night at the M.V. Film Center. I sing in Jim Thomas’s Spirituals Choir. Twelve Years a Slave depicts the world the slave songs came from, so I posted a brief comment on the U.S. Slave Song Project blog, for which I’m the admin.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Quorum

Consider this a postscript to “Marijuana Special”. I was going to include it in my account of West Tisbury’s special town meeting, but the marijuana articles got the munchies and ate up all the space.

Article 11 generated some thoughtful discussion that touched on, among other things, subjects I obsess about regularly: community and the polarized mess the country is in. The subject was quorums (quora?). At present, 5% of the town’s registered voters must be present for a town meeting to conduct business. At present 5% is about 122. By my calculations, that means there are currently, give or take, 2,440 registered voters in my town.

A town meeting cannot be called to order unless a quorum is present. If enough of those who constitute the quorum dribble away during the meeting, no more business can be conducted.

Article 11 proposed to rescind the quorum requirement. In other words, a town meeting could discuss and vote on warrant articles no matter how many registered voters showed up.

It's hard to work up a rant about "government" when it looks a lot like us. Starting 2nd from left: executive secretary Jen Rand; selectmen Cindy Mitchell, Richard Knabel, and (standing) Skipper Manter; town counsel Ron Rappaport; and moderator Pat Gregory.

It’s hard to work up a rant about “government” when it looks a lot like us. Starting 2nd from left: executive secretary Jen Rand; selectmen Cindy Mitchell, Richard Knabel, and (standing) Skipper Manter; town counsel Ron Rappaport; and moderator Pat Gregory.

No, this does not represent an attempt by “government” to snatch power from “the people.” Every time we convene in town meeting, some of “government” — our three selectmen, our moderator, our town clerk, and the town’s executive secretary — is sitting on the stage, and most of the rest — planning board, zoning board, finance, and school committee members and more — are sitting among us in the seats. We know these people. In many cases we are or have been these people.

Spring’s annual town meeting (ATM) regularly draws enough voters for three quorums. The official count for Tuesday night’s special was 164. The dogs-on-the-beach specials of recent memory were very well attended. (See “Democracy Face-to-Face” and “The Politics of Personalities” for more about this.) Why move to rescind the quorum requirement?

Because it sometimes happens that a special town meeting (STM) — one called to transact town business or consider issues that can’t or shouldn’t wait till the next ATM — doesn’t get a quorum. Maybe the warrant includes only routine business, like moving money from one category to another. Maybe the weather is bad. Without a quorum, the meeting can’t happen. In such cases, rescission proponents argued, the diligent citizens who do show up are being penalized for the non-diligence of those who don’t.

My strong gut reaction was Keep the quorum! 122 out of 2,440 is not a huge number. The pro-rescission arguments didn’t sway me at all. They didn’t sway most of my fellow citizens either: the motion was defeated on a strong voice vote. The 5% quorum requirement stands.

From the discussion I was surprised to learn that the quorum requirement was recent. “In 2006,” explained Richard Knabel in a post-meeting email, “after several STMs with rather low attendance, I realized that WT did not have a quorum requirement, the only town on the Island that didn’t.” He circulated a petition to put the issue on the next STM warrant and quickly collected 150 signatures, well over the 100 required. “People were very much in favor of a quorum requirement, and it passed easily,” he wrote. (Since 2008 Richard has been one of West Tisbury’s three selectmen.)

He recalled just two instances where an STM didn’t have a quorum: “In one we [the board of selectmen] postponed a week, and we had the meeting. In the other (this past spring) we just cancelled it.”

During the discussion I was particularly struck by the comments of one voter, a longtime participant in town politics and member of the League of Women Voters. She grew up in a small Connecticut town run by town meeting. As the town grew, participation in town meetings declined. Eventually the town adopted a “representative town meeting” government, in which voters elect citizens to represent them at town meeting. Over time, she said, things changed. People felt more and more detached from town government. They began to think of themselves as “us” and their elected officials as “them.”

In recent years I’ve become a regular voter and a regular town meeting goer, but I’m not a born-again zealot or a dewy-eyed idealist on the subject. During the 13 or 14 years I lived in Vineyard Haven, I hardly ever went to town meeting. Attend a town meeting or two and you’ll realize that to really participate in town government you have to do more than vote aye or nay or even get up and speak. To propose a change in, say, the school budget, you have to understand it as well as school committee and finance committee members do. This takes serious time and effort: following newspaper reports, attending meetings and public hearings, etc.

The corollary is that the sturm und drang devoted to an issue at town meeting is usually inversely related to its fiscal importance. Marijuana dispensaries and dogs on the beach take up much more time than the school budget. Which is not to say that marijuana dispensaries and dogs on the beach are unimportant, only that they don’t affect the tax rate.

You’ll also notice that there isn’t a lot of turnover among our elected officials. This is because in most town elections, most of them run unopposed. And while upwards of 15% of West Tisbury voters are attending annual town meeting, as many as 85% are doing something else.

This does not inspire great faith in participatory democracy. Nevertheless, I believe that having the option is important. When I don’t go to town meeting, it’s because I choose not to go. It’s not because I’m being shut out or because I think it’s someone else’s job. Which makes it harder — if I’m halfway honest about it — to slide into us/them mode. It’s so easy, and so comforting, to believe that all our problems are their fault.

It also lets us off the hook.

 

 

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

NIMBY Delight

Last fall, Vineyard voters voted overwhelmingly in favor of legalizing the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes, but some people are queasy about having a registered marijuana dispensary (RMD) anywhere close to a school, public park, or their own neighborhood. Sound familiar? People think wind power is a great idea but they don’t want to look at turbines. They’re addicted to cell phones but think cell phone towers rearrange your molecules and cause cancer. Etc., etc., etc.

Martha’s Vineyard being an island, it’s difficult to find a location that (a) isn’t in anyone’s backyard, and (b) hasn’t been locked down tight with conservation restrictions, but I’m here to tell you that yesterday I came upon the most unbelievably 100% perfect place to stick RMDs, sewage treatment centers, rendering plants, and all the other things Vineyarders don’t want to look at, think about, or smell. It’s got everything. Like security:

no trespassing

Public Order out here is totally under control, mainly because the public is nowhere in sight and unlikely to show up any time soon.

Check out the sanitation:

johnny

Even a recreational facility, if you can persuade the dog to move:

table

hydrantPublic safety is under control too. See? A fire hydrant. True, it’ll take an awfully long hose to get from here to the site, but that’s not our problem, is it?

Besides — fire shouldn’t be an issue because there’s nothing out here to burn.

Except trees, of course.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cool, huh? Look at all that potential. And the nearest residence is at least half a mile away, so the kiddies will be safe from all those marauding sick people and their friends.

landscape 1landscape 2

 

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, outdoors | Leave a comment

Marijuana Special

Don’t get excited — I haven’t gone to pot. The last time I saw the stuff up close and personal must have been at least 15 years ago. It’s probably been twice as long since I last came close to a contact high.

Voters check in with the registrars as they enter the gym. IDs are not required. You'd have a hard time passing yourself off as anyone else, and unless you can clone yourself, you can't vote twice.

Voters check in with the registrars as they enter the gym. IDs are not required. You’d have a hard time passing yourself off as anyone else, and unless you can clone yourself, you can’t vote twice.

However, marijuana is on my mind. Two marijuana-related articles were on Tuesday night’s special town meeting warrant.  As I walked across the dark playing fields en route to the school gym (where West Tisbury’s town meetings are held), I was not anticipating a smoke-in. I was thinking that a good way to make any subject boring is to turn it into a zoning article on a town meeting warrant.

The pros and cons of marijuana use were not on the table. The warrant articles were prompted by a ballot initiative passed last fall in Massachusetts, legalizing the use of marijuana for medical purposes. Ballot initiatives are simple: you vote yes or no; the initiative either passes or it doesn’t. Whereupon the overwhelming majority of voters forget about it.

If the initiative passes, though, our elected and appointed state officials have to work out how to implement the damn thing. As we all know, God, the Devil, and assorted interested parties duke it out in the details. Over the past year, state officials and committees have worked out those details. The basics: To start with, we’re to have no more than 35 medical marijuana dispensaries in the commonwealth. There must be at least one, but no more than five, in each of the commonwealth’s 14 counties. Dukes County — us — is the second-smallest of the lot; only Nantucket County is smaller. The widespread assumption is that there will be only one dispensary permitted in Dukes County.

Our town officials.  Starting 2nd from left: executive secretary Jen Rand; selectmen Cindy Mitchell, Richard Knabel, and (standing) Skipper Manter; town counsel Ron Rappaport; and moderator Pat Gregory.

Our town officials. Starting 2nd from left: executive secretary Jen Rand; selectmen Cindy Mitchell, Richard Knabel, and (standing) Skipper Manter; town counsel Ron Rappaport; and moderator Pat Gregory.

The state has set stringent requirements for anyone seeking a permit. Four Vineyard applicants have met the requirements, two proposing a dispensary in West Tisbury and two proposing one in Oak Bluffs. So the pressure is on our two towns to come up with rules and regs under which a hypothetical dispensary might operate.

The marijuana-related articles were #7 and #12 on the warrant. In articles 1 through 6, we voted to pay our share to replace the windows in the Dukes County Courthouse, created two stabilization funds (one for road maintenance, one for the maintenance of town-owned buildings), and moved some money around. Finally we reached article 7, which proposed a bylaw that no one “shall smoke, ingest, or otherwise use or consume” marijuana or THC.

while in or upon any street, sidewalk, public way, footway, passageway, stairs, bridge, park, playground, beach, recreation area, boat landing, public building, schoolhouse, school grounds, cemetery, parking lot, or any area owned by or under the control of the Town; or in or upon any bus or other passenger conveyance operated by a common carrier; or in any place accessible to the public.

Wow, thought I. Someone’s a little nervous about this marijuana thing. Then people started talking. One guy proposed an amendment that would delete “ingest, or otherwise use or consume” from the bylaw. The point, he suggested, was to keep an individual’s use of marijuana from impinging on others in the vicinity. Smoking might so impinge; other intake methods would not. The amendment passed.

Next we addressed the daunting list of places where marijuana could not be smoked. If smoke was the issue, some asked, why couldn’t marijuana be restricted the same way that cigarettes are restricted? Much discussion ensued. It wasn’t going anywhere, but it didn’t stop either.

Then something in the assembled citizenry changed, or started to change. I could feel it, in part because it was happening in my own head. A little nudge: We’re not getting anywhere. We’re not going to settle this tonight. And, really, how important is it? This will apply to a relatively small number of Vineyarders — a ballpark figure of 200 was given at one point — many of whom are seriously ill. Do we really need this nitpicky bylaw to keep them from smoking in public?

One voter rose to say as much. Could we table the motion? (A motion is the parliamentary procedure that brings a warrant article up for discussion. In the U.S., “table” means to put aside, take off the table. In the rest of the English-speaking world, it means the opposite.) Moderator Pat Gregory explained that tabling a motion requires a two-thirds vote; the usual procedure in these cases is to postpone indefinitely, which only needs a majority. A motion to postpone indefinitely was duly made, seconded, and passed by a substantial majority.

Article 12, the last on the warrant, was about zoning: Where in town can marijuana dispensaries be located, and what conditions must be fulfilled before a special permit can be issued? The discussion went on for at least 45 minutes.

An early question: What if we decide not to adopt any rules and regs, i.e., reject the article altogether? Town counsel Ron Rappaport explained that the commonwealth has said that no city or town can bar dispensaries altogether. What if a jurisdiction decides against adopting rules and regs? That, he said, is unclear. What-ifs are generally settled in court, and this law is so new that no case law has developed to help the legal beagles interpret it. By not adopting guidelines, we might be abdicating whatever control we have over the process.

Discussion zeroed in on location. Article 12 proposed amending the town’s zoning bylaw to allow marijuana dispensaries in the mixed business district and the two light industrial districts. Some wanted to exclude the mixed business district because that’s where the M.V. Public Charter School is. Others proposed excluding the light industrial area that includes the town dump because there’s a “residential area” close by. If adopted, these proposals would have limited dispensaries to the town-controlled area at the Airport Business Park, with no guarantee that there was actually space available there.

It wasn’t hard to see where this was going, or what was behind it: the fear that the marijuana dispensaries would attract villainous lowlifes who would prey on children and peaceful householders. Similar fears, of everything from terrorists to vaccinations to refined white flour, are at large in the country, and so far attempts to counter them haven’t been very effective.

But — before my very eyes — the citizens of my town pushed back. One guy reminded us that marijuana was not being made available to the general public. A woman pointed out that she’d been unable to obtain a certificate for medical marijuana use, even though she has a possibly qualifying condition: this disputed the specter raised by some that anyone who wanted a certificate could get one. I went to the microphone and said that though I could walk from my apartment to the dump in five minutes, that light industrial district was a world apart from where people lived. (Don’t be thinking “suburban subdivision” here. You can barely see the houses for the trees.) Another man noted that Conroy’s Apothecary was directly across the road from the charter school; it dispensed prescription drugs far more dangerous than marijuana and so far the purchasers of such drugs hadn’t corrupted any students.

Article 12 passed almost as written. The only amendment changed the permit-granting authority from the board of selectmen to the zoning board of appeals, which made perfect sense because ordinarily granting permits is the ZBA’s job.

The meeting had come to order around 7 p.m. It was adjourned around 9. Two hours is considerably longer than it takes to vote, at least in my town. As I walked home across the dark field, flashlight in hand, I thought about all the hoo-hah that surrounds voting, especially the nasty maxim “If you don’t vote, you can’t complain.” That’s crap. If all you do is vote, you’re leaving the details up to others — anonymous committees, perhaps, or the staff of whoever you elected. No wonder the results are so often not what the voters intended.

Roughly half of the electorate Tuesday night at West Tisbury's special town meeting

Roughly half of the electorate Tuesday night at West Tisbury’s special town meeting

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

October License Plate Report

Nothing exciting to report. No, make that nothing to report. The count stands where it was at the end of September and at the end of August, at 43.

I did spot one license plate worth reporting, though. Don’t get excited: this Hawaii plate was in Hawaii, not on Martha’s Vineyard. I saw it on Facebook. The owner used to live here. Besides, I think it’s a hoot.

Karin plate

And here’s the map. C’mon, Missouri. You’re my best hope to make another tally before the end of the year.

2013 aug license map

Posted in license plates | Tagged | Leave a comment

Season of the Scarecrow

The scarecrows are back!

Trav and I met several on our walk to the post office the other day. He had a greeting for every single one. Well, OK, I’m not sure if it was a greeting or a challenge to do battle, but whatever it was, Trav was intrigued.

Miles Davis, @ Julie Robinson Interiors

Miles Davis, @ Julie Robinson Interiors

The scarecrows are a fundraiser for the Martha’s Vineyard Public Charter School, which is just a bit up the road. Now in its 14th year, the Scarecrow Festival was the brainchild of Gwen Natusch. Paul Karasik has been Scarecrow Overlord for the last eight years. (And you thought he was just a artist, cartoonist, writer, and teacher??)

Anyone can make a scarecrow. Businesses then donate $100 for the honor of hosting one. The Scarecrow Overlord and his councilors then match hosts with scarecrows. This year there are a record-breaking 80+ scarecrows, and you can find them in every town but Aquinnah. (To plan your scarecrow tour, check out the Charter School’s website.)

This year’s theme is music. First up on Trav’s and my mini-tour was Miles Davis.

 

Devil Lady and Li'l Devil @ Tea Lane Associates

Devil Lady and Li’l Devil @ Tea Lane Associates

Next was Tea Lane Associates, where Devil Lady and Li’l Devil leaned against the signposts as if they’d been waiting for us to show up. That looks like a ukulele in the little guy’s hand, but s/he didn’t play for us as we passed by.

Devil Lady reminded me a bit of Morticia Addams. I wonder if they’re related.

At the M.V. Savings Bank we encountered a different breed of scarecrow. Trav tried to engage Tazcula in a duel, or maybe it was a duet he was after. Tazcula glared back, unimpressed, which only spurred Trav to greater effort.

Trav tries to engage Tazcula in a duet, or a duel, or something.

Trav tries to get a reaction from Tazcula.

Tazcula @ M.V. Savings Bank

Tazcula @ M.V. Savings Bank

The witch at Vineyard Gardens strums her broom when she’s not flying on it. Trav was fascinated. First he sang along. Then he tried to filch the witch’s glove. “Not a good idea,” I said. “The witch might turn you into a chihuahua.”

Trav wanted to know what a chihuahua was. “They are very small,” I said, “and they cannot woo.” Trav gave up on the glove. I gave him a cookie.

witch & trav

Broom Balalaika @ Vineyard Gardens

Last scarecrow on our mini-tour was Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, outside the supermarket. Another dog was tethered to the nearby bike rack, so Trav didn’t get to pose with Lucy. Maybe another time, or maybe another scarecrow. We spotted the Cat in the Hat outside Edu Comp in Vineyard Haven, and there are at least 75 more we haven’t visited yet.

Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds @ Up-Island Cronig's

Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds @ Up-Island Cronig’s

Posted in Martha's Vineyard | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

The Road to the Overlook

Writing about writing is usually boring except to writers, and when writers read writing about writing it’s often because they’re procrastinating or blocked or otherwise not writing.

In this blog post I’m writing about writing, but I’m going to dress it up with Vineyard photographs to make it more bloggish.

The Squatters’ Speakeasy (working title) has been evolving. This is good. But it keeps running into walls. This is not so good. I know what I want to happen. I want some characters to start a grassroots movement to demand affordable year-round housing. But this is so far from anything that’s ever happened in real life that I couldn’t even begin to imagine such a thing. I was stuck.

do not enterHow about introducing a magical element to make it happen? No go. Fantasy only works if the writer believes it, and I didn’t. My fictional Martha’s Vineyard obeys the same physical laws as the Martha’s Vineyard I live on. I came up with a few other halfhearted ideas. My plot director, who’s been observing Vineyard life pretty closely for almost 30 years, shot them all down before they were airborne.

Meanwhile, the mysterious force that I call my muse was playing in the background. As I was falling asleep one night, she dropped an image into my head: people camped out on the Tashmoo Overlook.

Wonder of wonders, the plot director was intrigued. Who were these people? No idea. How did they did there? No idea about that either. “Maybe I could draw or paint them in?” I suggested. “How about Photoshop?”

“You can’t draw or paint worth beans,” replied the plot director, “and last I looked, you couldn’t Photoshop to save your life. If you want campers on the overlook, you’re going to have to plot them in. Ha ha ha.”

“OK,” said I, “but you’re going to have to help me out here.”

Turned out some of the pieces were already in place. I started connecting the dots. The story so far takes place in May. I’ve already written a big, portentous set-piece of a scene for the beginning of Memorial Day weekend. (If you’re curious about this, see “Benefit Art Show.”)

Every Memorial Day, the town of Tisbury throws a big picnic at — guess where? — the Tashmoo Overlook. What if a few of the picnickers stayed late? What if they camped out all night and were still there in the morning?

The plot director loved this idea. Squatters, like Mud of the Place, is an ensemble piece with several viewpoint characters. Which one was going to pull the campers into the story? At this point I didn’t know who the campers were, so it couldn’t be one of them. Shannon, of course, said my muse as Travvy and I walked one morning down the path behind the West Tisbury School.

That was almost two weeks ago. Shannon’s route to the Tashmoo Overlook was, of course, longer and twistier than I’d imagined. Best of all, it turned up a villain I didn’t know I’d been looking for until he showed up — at an AA meeting, of all places. Yesterday morning I finished a very rough draft, in brown ink, annotated here and there in a red-orange ink called Fireball. Yesterday afternoon Travvy and I headed into Vineyard Haven to retrace Shannon’s route to the Tashmoo Overlook. If there were any impossibilities in my draft, I wanted to know before I started typing it into a shape my writers’ group can read tomorrow night.

Baptist parish house, William St., Vineyard Haven

Baptist parish house, William St., Vineyard Haven

The AA meeting was what brought Shannon into town on a Monday night, to the Baptist church parish house. It’s not a meeting she usually attends, but the meeting has been struggling and the current secretary asked her and another veteran AA to lend their experience, strength, and hope to the regular members, most of whom are fairly young in the program.

During the meeting, Shannon helps head off a member who monopolizes the floor and is intimidating other members. After the meeting, her buddy (whose name is currently Jack) waits for Shannon outside, smoking a cigarette. I had him leaning on a stone wall parallel to the parish house. There is no stone wall parallel to the parish house. Oops.

Smokers' corner

Smokers’ corner

The real stone wall is parallel to the church just next door. Fortunately this works just fine. Better than fine: see the butt-disposal unit next to the wall? Jack, who is trying to quit, stubs out his cigarette when it’s only half smoked. Now he won’t be tempted to relight it.

Jack knows and distrusts the disruptive meeting member. Breaking the man’s anonymity, he tells Shannon who he is and warns her to be careful. “See, see, see?” says my plot director. “Have we got a part for him or what?”

water works signShannon heads off down West Spring Street, which at night is dark and quiet and offers an alternative to State Road, which in late May is neither. West Spring bends sharply to the left and then climbs past the headquarters of the Tisbury Water Works, which is down an asphalt driveway and almost out of sight from the road. On the other side of the woods is the Tashmoo Overlook.

The path through the woods, with Travvy, who so far is less than enthusiastic about this research project

The path through the woods, with Travvy, who so far is less than enthusiastic about this research project

Approaching State Road just uphill from the overlook, we hit a snag: No way could Shannon spot lights in the meadow from West Spring. The woods are too deep, the trees too dense. She has to see the lights from State Road. I’ll figure that out later.

The good news is that the path I remembered is really there, leading from West Spring to the meadow, and wide as a boulevard. Shannon and her flashlight will have no trouble following it in the dark.

More good news awaited me at the other end of the path: A small camp — at the moment it’s two four-person tents and an old-fashioned canvas pup tent — could nestle at the end of the meadow. The dropoff from the lay-by, where tourists park to photograph Lake Tashmoo in the distance and the cell phone reception is good, is steep enough to conceal a clandestine camp from the road, at least at night. Trav and I had to wade through tall grass and shrubbery to photograph it from a good angle, but the field is mowed for the town picnic so it should make a good campsite.

hollow

That’s State Road curving up the hill on the right; Malvina Forester is parked on the lay-by. The woods Trav and I walked through are dead ahead, across the meadow. I hear voices; the tents are flickering in and out of existence. Can you see them yet?

What happens when Shannon emerges from the woods, flashlight in hand? I’ll leave that till later. Needless to say, she and I were both surprised by what we saw and heard. The plot director is unabashedly thrilled. She’s got an illicit encampment and a zealous town employee who wants to shut it down. What’s not to like?

This is what most people stop at the lay-by to look at, so of course I looked at it too.

This is what most people stop at the lay-by to look at, so of course I looked at it too.

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

On Community

This is a sequel of sorts to “Vineyard Exceptional.” At the end of “Vineyard Exceptional” I said that I’d bitten off more than I could chew. This was true. I said that a follow-up on community would be along soon. Ha ha ha. If October 16 is “soon” after September 17, then that’s true too.

When I lived in D.C. the second time round (1977–1985), “community” was in the air. Women’s community, lesbian community, gay community, black community, Dupont Circle community . . . We talked about community a lot, but I rarely thought about what a community was, or what made one work.

Many of us had fled our home communities, finding them stifling or intolerant. We were misfits in one way or another and mostly proud of it. We wanted to start something new. What we started was wonderful in many ways, but volatile and often turbulent. It was exhausting, trying to keep my balance on the bow of a pitching ship. Eventually I fled.

West Tisbury annual town meeting

West Tisbury annual town meeting

I landed on Martha’s Vineyard. Like most new arrivals, I was continually comparing the Vineyard to the place I’d just left. The comparison highlighted a few things I’d never really noticed about the D.C. women’s community. There nearly everyone I knew was within 10 years of my own age. Most of us came from somewhere else. I could know someone for years and never meet any of her blood relatives. Kinship in the lesbian community was about non-blood relationships: the women you’d lived, worked, and/or slept with, past and present; and the women they’d lived, worked, and/or slept with, and so on.

Within a year or two, my Vineyard circle was multigenerational: I knew people from 8 to 80 and then some. I knew people who’d been born and brought up here, whose parents and grandparents and even further back had been born and brought up here. Many of the people I met had kids, parents, cousins, and siblings in the vicinity. (One of the first things I learned was to keep my mouth shut till I figured out who a new acquaintance was related to.)

What my D.C. community lacked, I realized, was ballast, the stability that comes when people are linked several times over in a web that goes back generations.

Sorting donations at West Tisbury's Dumptique: community in action.

Sorting donations at West Tisbury’s Dumptique: community in action.

The more I learned about the way the Vineyard worked, the more I marveled. It wasn’t just the volunteer energy that sustained everything from the town fire departments to community theater, after-school activities to houses of worship. It was the way neighbors kept an eye out for neighbors who were ill or frail or just having a hard time. Kids from screwed-up families found refuge in informal fostering arrangements that often didn’t involve blood relatives.

The old island fabric of multiply interrelated families was part of this, of course, but the fabric managed to incorporate plenty of new arrivals who weren’t related to anybody. I arrived as a single person who not only wasn’t related to anybody; I knew only one year-round resident, period. Yet within a few months I was pulled into one informal “family” group, and later I became part of others.

Everybody, it seemed, knew everything about everyone else, though they didn’t say much about it in public. After a while I realized that this tightly woven web had a downside.

In 1987 my friend Nancy Luedeman (1920–2010) made a panel for the AIDS Quilt (which I had seen in D.C. at its first showing earlier that year, when it contained fewer than 2,000 panels). It memorialized four Vineyard men. Two were identified only by their initials, two by first name and last initial. Nancy knew who they were. Their families didn’t want their names used.

Martha’s Vineyard, in other words, was one of those places that people like me had fled.

The conundrum has perplexed and intrigued me ever since. Communities are like any other amalgamation of human beings. They ask each individual to give up some autonomy in the interest of cohesiveness and harmony. Some deviance is allowed, even expected: “Oh, she’s such a character!” Deviance that’s seen to threaten community cohesiveness usually isn’t.

Fron Cover MockupWhen I moved here and for several years afterward, I never heard the word “lesbian” said aloud in public unless I said it myself. That’s changed. My Mud of the Place deals with a gay islander’s fear of coming out: he’s afraid he’ll be cast into the void if he does, rejected by family and community. The novel is set in the late 1990s. More recent arrivals want to be reassured that this couldn’t happen today. I equivocate. “It’s not just about being gay,” I say. “It’s about anything you’re afraid to say or be or do for fear of being shunned by the people you love and depend on.”

On Martha’s Vineyard “community” is often talked about as if it’s endemic, one of those inherent qualities that’s said to make the Vineyard exceptional. I tend to disagree, not least because what we’ve got is plural, communities. They overlap, of course. They overlap and intertwine, but they also bump up against each other and bristle when they do.

So what sustains a community? What fosters the sense of mutual responsibility and obligation without which community falls apart? I’ve come to believe that it’s ultimately rooted in need. We don’t have to like each other, though it’s nice if we do. But if we have to get along in order to survive, we mostly will — most of the time.

But on this ever more affluent Vineyard, many of us no longer need to get along. If you can jump in the car and drive to the store for a half gallon of milk, why bother to go next door and borrow a cup from your neighbor? We consider tolerance to be a virtue and ourselves to be tolerant, but when we don’t need to get along, how tempting it is to associate with like-minded folks and avoid those we consider prickly or disagreeable, even when they live just up the road.

We’re still talking about community, though. We want it, but do we know what it takes to keep it going?

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, musing | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments