Democracy Face-to-Face

On Martha’s Vineyard “ATM” stands for “annual town meeting” at least as often as for “automated teller machine.” We have that kind of ATM too, but I deal with non-automated tellers whenever possible because the ATMs (1) don’t know my name, and (2) don’t dispense dog biscuits.

From left: executive secretary Jen Rand; selectmen Cindy Mitchell, Skipper Manter, and Richard Knabel; town counsel Ron Rappaport; and (standing) moderator Pat Gregory. Microphone in foreground is for citizens speaking from the floor.

In the town meeting form of government, the town’s voters function as a legislature. Each island town has a board of selectmen, a finance committee, a planning board, and various other boards and committees whose members are either elected or appointed by elected officials. These boards and committees do the heavy lifting, preparing budgets, drafting rules and regulations, etc., etc., but whatever they recommend has to be approved by town meeting before it goes into effect.

West Tisbury voters arrive for last night's special town meeting. Ginny Jones and Tony Rezendes check each one's name against the voter rolls.

Having grown up in Massachusetts, I’ve known about town meeting government all my life. My father and my grandmother were town meeting regulars. This may be one reason that for me voting is not the be-all and end-all of democracy. Going into a voting booth and making Xes — no hanging chads on Martha’s Vineyard; we vote on paper ballots — is a pale substitute for going to town meeting and listening to your fellow citizens orate for this or against that and occasionally get into rhetorical skirmishes with each other.

Not that I idealize town meetings, however. Not long after I moved to Martha’s Vineyard, maybe around 1988, I sat in West Tisbury’s ATM and listened to my fellow citizens go on for about 45 minutes about snowmobiles in Christiantown (a part of town with lots of woods). The school budget, in contrast, was approved in less than 15 minutes, with a few questions but almost no discussion. As a result I came up with “snowmobiles-in-Christiantown syndrome,” which holds that the amount of time and energy consumed by an issue is inversely proportional to its practical importance. To argue with the school budget, you have to know what you’re talking about: the school committee and the finance committee have been laboring on the thing for many weeks, and to take issue with their recommendation you have to know almost as much as they do. To rail against snowmobiles in Christiantown (or dirt bikers in the state forest), all you need is an opinion.

In the years since I have come to believe that snowmobiles-in-Christiantown syndrome is so common in human gatherings that it must have other names in other places. Nevertheless, that is what I call it.

So at West Tisbury’s special town meeting last night — spring is annual town meeting season in New England, but a town may call a special to deal with business that comes up between ATMs — the hot issue on the warrant was dog poop on Lambert’s Cove Beach. Between June 15 and September 15 (“the season”) dogs have been allowed on the beach before 10 a.m. and after 5 p.m. Article 2 on the warrant proposed that dogs and horses not be allowed on the beach at all during the summer months.

This is not the first time the issue has come up in town. The parks & recreation committee, under whose jurisdiction the matter falls, is clearly frazzled by years of attempting to balance the passionate desire of dog owners to run their dogs at the beach, and the equally passionate desire of other beachgoers not to step in dog shit, get knocked down by dogs, and/or have dogs scamper across their picnic blankets. I rarely go to the beach, and heavy-coated Travvy is not a beach dog, so I didn’t (so to speak) have a dog in this fight. I just listened.

West Tisbury voters in the West Tisbury School gym

Some people talked as if the beach was practically paved with dog droppings, and that a kid couldn’t dig in the sand without encountering a, uh, beach cruller. Others said that they knew families with children who no longer went to the beach because of the dogs and dog droppings. Oddly enough, or maybe not so oddly, these arguments made me think of pro-roundabout people who freak out at four-way stops and anti-roundabout people who freak out at roundabouts. This is shifty ground to build an argument on: What does the beach actually look like? I wondered. I wished I’d been there more recently to see for myself. I thought about asking if the number of beach stickers sold was down, but I was so sure the answer would be no that the question seemed rude.

Moderator Pat Gregory, master of parliamentary procedure

A motion was made to amend the article to allow dogs before 10 a.m. but not after 5 p.m. I voted for the amendment. It failed, 54 for, 80 against. The voice vote was close enough that moderator Pat Gregory called for a hand count. The next motion was to table the article till spring. I voted for that too. It failed, 63–66. Finally the article itself came up and was debated. It passed on another close vote, 64–61. I was one of the 61.

The other nine articles on the warrant combined took up less time than the beachgoing dogs. We voted to accept the gift of the Mill Pond dam from the M.V. Garden Club; the town has been maintaining it for years, and it only came to light recently that the Garden Club actually owned it. We moved some money from this line to that line and voted $10,000 to evaluate a contract “for the financing, construction and maintenance of a solar photovoltaic array at the Town landfill that will provide power to Town buildings.”

We agreed that on-call police officers should be paid $75 per shift and created the position of lieutenant in the WTPD, in part to assist the chief with administrative tasks and also to provide incentive for career-minded officers. And we approved the expenditure of  $1,000 for maintenance of the Greenlands, a conservation property owned by the town at the edge of the state forest, and also to put up “No ATV” signs even though nobody expects these will do any good.

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Rally at the Tennis Court

The weather being gloriously sunny and warm for mid-November, three of us went to the dogs on Sunday. Loose translation: We took over the public tennis courts for an hour and filmed ourselves and our dogs doing a Rally-O course. Yes, these are the same tennis courts featured at the top of this blog. In November there are no locks on the gate.

We study the course before a Rally run.

Rally — the “O” stands for Obedience — is the dog sport that Travvy and I have been competing in. To horse people I describe it as “dressage for dogs.” Dog-and-handler teams complete a course of from 12 to 20 stations, depending on the level, each of which requires the team to perform a different exercise. The exercises range from very simple — “Halt. Sit.” or “Left Turn” — to fairly complex, like “Call Front, Finish Right” and “Sit, Stand, Walk Around Dog.” Having finished our APDT Level 2 title, we’re now learning the advanced exercises required at Level 3, like “Drop on Recall” (you call the dog to you from a distance then signal him to lie down when he’s halfway there) and “Retrieve” (not an inbred skill for most Alaskan malamutes).

Rally comes in several varieties — we’re currently competing in the one organized by APDT, the Association of Pet Dog Trainers. The newest kid on the block is Cyber Rally-O (CRO). CRO differs in several significant respects from other kinds of Rally. A big one is that you don’t have to travel anywhere. You download the signs, set up one of the prescribed courses in your backyard or another convenient location, have someone video you and your dog doing it, then upload your video to YouTube so the judges can judge it. Registration is all electronic.

For us, competing in off-island trials starts and ends with a ferry trip ($59 round-trip in the off-season, $88 in summer) and usually involves one or two nights away from home. Virtual competition has an obvious appeal for island dwellers!

So Sunday Karen Ogden, Katy Upson, and I Rallied (so to speak) at the West Tisbury tennis court to do our thing. We were, of course, accompanied by Nolan (Australian shepherd), Dundee (Scottie), and Travvy (Alaskan malamute), respectively. Karen is the proprietor of Positive Rewards Dog Training, where Katy and I both train. We managed to get some good runs in before a nice fellow and his daughter showed up to play tennis.

I’m pleased to report that Travvy and I earned our first leg toward our CRO-1 (Level 1) title. (Titles, unlike dogs, only require three legs.) Each entry requires a walk-through (handler only) to show that the course is set up correctly, a demonstration of the dog’s equipment (collar, harness, and/or leash — prong collars, choke chains, and the like are not permitted), and the run itself. Here are some still shots lifted from our video. (The whole run, plus walk-through, can be seen on YouTube.)

Equipment check. Travvy wears a "limited slip" collar. We didn't use the leash.

Here we execute the “Serpentine, Weave Twice,” in which the team weaves through four cones and then returns to the first cone. Big dogs have to be agile and attentive to avoid knocking a cone over. Handlers have to be agile and attentive and remember that you always enter the cones from the right.

The sign here says “Call Front, Finish Right.” Here Travvy is in front position and I am making the hand signal that tells him to “finish right” — go around behind me and wind up in heel position, at my left side.

We finish the course! When taping a Cyber Rally-O run, the handler raises her hand as the team passes the start and finish lines. This is to make it easy for the judges to tell where the course starts and ends. The maximum time allowed for a run is five minutes. This particular course didn’t require even half that. Note: My exposed right sock is not a fashion statement. I’m just a sloppy dresser.

Posted in dogs | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Yesterday (Monday, November 14, if you’ve lost track <g>), the Edgartown board of selectmen voted unanimously to appeal the Martha’s Vineyard Commission’s approval of the roundabout in superior court. It’s hoped and even expected that the West Tisbury board of selectmen will do likewise (maybe not unanimously) at its meeting tomorrow, Wednesday. See “Edgartown Will Try to Block Roundabout in Court” in the online Vineyard Gazette.

Posted on by Susanna J. Sturgis | 2 Comments

Horsesitter

Travvy in snooze position

I’ve got a horsesitting gig this weekend, which rearranges my morning routine somewhat.  Usually I get up, feed Trav, boot up Hekate the laptop, go downstairs (where my bathroom is) to brush teeth and splash water on face, and come back upstairs to find Travvy slumped against the front door wondering why his breakfast is so meager. Then I get dressed, zap some tea if there’s any left over from yesterday, and sit down with Hekate.

At this point Travvy thinks, Here we go again, and if it isn’t raining he scratches the door to go continue his snoozing out on the deck. I then spend a ridiculous amount of time checking e-mail, catching up with my Facebook Scrabble games, and responding to any e-mail or FB posts that interest me. Then my resigned-to-waiting (not quite the same as “patient”) dog and I go for a longish walk. When we get home, 45 minutes to an hour later, I put on the kettle for a fresh pot of tea and a saucepan for my daily dose of Irish oatmeal. At that point the workday begins.

When I’m horsesitting, morning chores have to be worked into the schedule. Since daylight savings time ended a week ago, it gets light early enough for Trav and I to get a abbreviated walk in before I head off to feed the hosses. There’s a dog involved in this particular gig, Bleu the excitable Briard, so Trav doesn’t come along. The late Rhodry accompanied me to whatever barn I was working at and could generally be trusted to stick around and play with the other dogs. Trav can’t be trusted loose if there are free-range chickens within about five miles, which is to say he can’t be trusted loose on Martha’s Vineyard. If I make the front page of the newspapers, it’s not going to be because my dog went fowling without a license.

Cole (left) and Contessa in September

The residents of this particular barn are Coltrane, “Cole,” a Dales pony gelding, and Contessa, a feisty mini (miniature horse) who will slip through any cracked-open gate or stall door that you’re foolish enough to turn your back on. Rhodry and Contessa had a game going: When she wasn’t looking, he’d slip between the rails into the paddock, and when she spotted him she’d make a beeline in his direction, whereupon he’d exit through the fence faster than you thought a big dog could. When Rhodry blogged, he called Contessa “the puppyhorse.” So do I.

Home, I like to say, is where you can find the light switches in the dark — the same goes for all the barns I’ve worked in (the ones with electricity, that is). This is good because it was pitch-dark when I arrived last night to do evening chores and no lights were on in the barn. I do have a tiny LED flashlight clipped to the zipper of my fleece vest: very handy. Feeding instructions had multiplied and complexified since I was last there two months ago. I managed to read them in dim light without my glasses on. Whew.

This morning light was plentiful. I left Trav on the deck gnawing at a marrow bone slathered on the inside with peanut butter and headed off to the barn. Since I sold Allie almost a year and a half ago, I haven’t missed the horse world at all; still it’s cool to be whickered at by equines even before you open the barn door, and to know exactly what you’re doing, even in someone else’s barn. Feed: check. Hay: check. Water: check. Gates secure, electric fence on: check, check.

Me mucking a stall about 10 years ago

Contessa and Cole have the ideal horse set-up: a big hilly paddock with room to run, and access to shelter — two box stalls with the wall between them removed — whenever they want it. This morning I cleaned the stall, picked out the paddock, and thought (not for the first time) that piles of manure on a bed of fallen brown leaves would make a great jigsaw puzzle.

Posted in home, work | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Veterans Day

He’s five foot two and he’s six foot four
He fights with missiles and with spears
He’s all of thirty-one and he’s only seventeen
He’s been a soldier for a thousand years
— Buffy Sainte-Marie, “Universal Soldier”

Ambivalent about Veterans Day? No shit.

From time to time I see this sticker on car and truck bumpers: If you love your freedom thank a vet. I was born in 1951, six years after end of the war widely referred to as “good.” The connection between freedom and fighting Nazi Germany is pretty obvious. But the wars waged by my country during my lifetime have at best a tenuous connection with freedom, unless we’re talking about the freedom of U.S. corporations and their friends to control markets in the rest of the world. U.S. corporations aren’t the “you” being addressed here, however, and many vets would strenuously object to the notion that corporate interests had anything to do with their being shot at.

The risks and horrors of war need a more glorious justification. Freedom.

When I see that bumper sticker I think: If you love your freedom, thank the drafters of the Bill of Rights. Thank Susan B. Anthony, Mother Jones, Woody Guthrie, Martin Luther King Jr., the ACLU, and everyone else who keeps freedom alive by living it. Each person who exercises her freedom expands mine, perhaps by challenging unjust laws, perhaps by inspiring me and giving me courage. Most of these people didn’t have an army behind them. Some of them had opponents with superior weaponry pointing guns in their direction.

I think: How many of us do love our freedom? Plenty of us shrink from it at every opportunity: the further we get from the bumper sticker, the scarier freedom gets. Do we have any idea what it is?

I remember a slogan of my antiwar-movement youth: Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity. Ends don’t justify means; means generate, or at least strongly shape, their own ends. How does a huge hierarchical organization based on following orders create freedom?

My father fought in World War II, in North Africa and Italy. He rarely talked about it. We both read Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 around the same time, when I was in high school, and he said that described his war experience better than anything else he’d ever read. He didn’t join the American Legion or the VFW. I think he loved his freedom as much as anybody, and made good use of it, but he never, ever would have put one of those bumper stickers on his car.

My uncle Neville, not quite a year and a half younger than my father, fought in that “good war” too and came back, well, changed. “Shell-shocked” is the word I grew up with. PTSD wasn’t coined till later, but that’s probably what it was. Today was his birthday. He was born on November 11, 1923, five years to the day after the guns fell silent on the Western Front. Happy birthday, Nev.

 

Posted in musing | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

Would Clicker Training Help the MVC?

What to make of last Thursday night’s Martha’s Vineyard Commission (MVC) meeting, at which a motion was made to rescind the October 6 vote to approve the roundabout project, with certain conditions pertaining to bicyclists, pedestrians, bus stops, and landscaping? Once again, the discussion and the decision added up to less than the information that went into them.

When I got home that night, I didn’t know what to say. I was no more inspired by Friday afternoon, when I drove onto the 3:45 boat en route to a dog training seminar in Taunton. Maybe not thinking about roundabouts for 36 hours would clear the murk and muck out of my brain?

Well, it did and it didn’t. Bear with me while I go off on what looks like a tangent. The training seminar was taught by Jane Killion, author of When Pigs Fly: Training Success with Impossible Dogs. Jane raises and breeds bull terriers. Bull terriers aren’t easy to train, which is to say that the methods that work fine with “biddable” dogs like Labs, goldens, and Australian shepherds don’t work well with them. In learning how to train her bull terriers, Jane studied learning theory and behavior modification and developed a training method that works with “impossible” dogs.

Alaskan malamutes aren’t biddable either. At the age of one, my Travvy wasn’t just an Alaskan malamute; he was a reactive, impulsive Alaskan malamute with a high prey drive and a low tolerance for frustration. I was in over my head — but it had already dawned on me that Trav was my guide on a journey into new territory. We’re seriously lucky on Martha’s Vineyard to have an excellent dog trainer: Karen Ogden of Positive Rewards Dog Training. Karen recommended When Pigs Fly. I’ve been a Jane fan ever since.

If positive methods got *us* this far . . .

Both Jane and Karen employ “positive” methods that encourage the dogs to figure things out instead of being force-fed solutions by their handlers. It’s challenging, it’s fun, and — most important — it works.

So — if reinforcement techniques work with “impossible dogs,” would they work with our elected and appointed representatives? Even my casual acquaintance with learning theory and dog training leads me to suspect that these principles explain plenty about what happens in public life. Politicos are like Travvy, me, and all the rest of us: if a behavior is continually reinforced, it continues and gets stronger; if it’s not, it eventually goes away. Trav is reinforced by the click of a clicker, because he knows that after the click comes good stuff like turkey dog bits, string cheese, and being able to sniff a particularly redolent shrub. Politicos are reinforced by stuff like money, acclaim, and (one hopes, at least sometimes) the satisfaction that comes with doing a good job.

Clickers on a bed of Charlee Bears, garnished with string cheese

OK, I’ve convinced myself. I’m going to try reinforcement techniques in this account of the Martha’s Vineyard Commission meeting.

Commissioner Lenny Jason moved to rescind  the October 6 vote. “We didn’t approve a plan, we approved a concept,” he said. The plan the MVC majority voted to approve was only 25% complete, no traffic studies had been done, no environmental impact statement had been filed. The nominal applicant in this case is the Town of Oak Bluffs; the one with the bucks is the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. We “treated the state differently from other applicants,” noted Mr. Jason. Mr. Jason gets a big click and all the string cheese he wants.

One pro-roundabout commissioner from Oak Bluffs launched into a long preamble about how carefully he had considered the matter, then said that voting to rescind the October 6 vote would undermine the credibility of the Martha’s Vineyard Commission. The other Oak Bluffs commissioner, also pro-roundabout, said that rescission would lead people to question the MVC’s integrity. Note that I am employing “negative punishment” by not mentioning the names of these individuals, on the theory that for politicos, as for writers, even negative publicity is good publicity. The main point is that the “credibility” and “integrity” of the MVC are theoretical concepts that may not exist in the real world. Public opposition to the roundabout is running something like 3 to 1. Most people who oppose the roundabout are not impressed by the MVC’s handling of the subject.

Another pro-roundabout commissioner — not from Oak Bluffs — discoursed at some length about the anti-roundabout comments she had read in the press, including the Martha’s Vineyard Times website. She was not happy with this “intimidation” (her word). She feared that commissioners appointed by their town’s board of selectmen might feel especially intimidated. No click for her — but I’ll toss her a treat for calling Mr. London’s memo “ridiculous.” The hearing officer, Doug Sederholm from Chilmark (name semi-redacted), was audibly annoyed by this.

Ned Orleans said that he did not feel intimidated, even though he was appointed to the MVC by the Tisbury board of selectmen, two of whom are pro-roundabout. Mr. Orleans voted against the roundabout, and for the rescission of the October 6 vote. A big click for him.

Another click for Mr. Jason, too, for noting that if you take a stand, half the people will disagree with you, and “if anyone at this table is intimidated, they should get up and leave.” He also took issue with the notion that rescinding a vote might be seen to undermine one’s credibility or integrity. He was raised to acknowledge his mistakes, he said. Bravo.

Jim Joyce of Edgartown expressed reservations about the October 6 vote, which was taken at almost 11 p.m., when everyone had been itching to get out of there for almost an hour. A click for him: the fact that he voted for the roundabout didn’t prevent him from noticing that the vote itself was problematic.

So after yet another lackluster discussion the time came to vote. Voting for rescission: Jim Joyce, Ned Orleans, Camille Rose, Linda Sibley, Christina Brown, and Lenny Jason. Voting against: Doug Sederholm, Holly Stephenson, John Breckenridge, Erik Hammarlund, and Fred Hancock.

Oh wow, I just had time to think; 6 to 5! We did it!

But no: Chris Murphy, current MVC chair, once again snatched stupidity from the jaws of reason by voting no: a tie vote meant the motion to rescind failed. “He’s got balls,” Lenny Jason muttered, loud enough for the whole room to hear.

Granted. What he hasn’t got is class. Brian Smith of West Tisbury, a well-informed and articulate voice against the roundabout, was unavoidably out of the country and not at the meeting. Had he been present, the vote would have been 7–5, and Mr. Murphy’s grandstanding would have been futile. The word “schmuck” comes to mind.

Posted in dogs, Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Slantwise

As far as slants go, the Leaning Tower of Pisa has nothing on Nelson Sigelman’s coverage of the Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation’s suit against Ben Ramsey and Nisa Counter. The latest installment was posted yesterday on the Martha’s Vineyard Times website. It concerns a settlement conference that took place almost a month ago before Massachusetts Land Court associate justice Alexander Sands. For a more timely account of what went on at the conference, see my “It Ain’t Over Yet,” which was posted here on October 9.

If I could correct the slant on the MVTimes website, I would, but I’m still blocked from posting comments there. So I’m doing it here. Feel free to forward the link to Mr. Sigelman, SMF, and anyone else who might be interested.

What the Times says: “A lawyer for the Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation (SMF) told a Massachusetts Land Court judge the conservation organization would not participate in mediation with an Island couple to settle a lawsuit over a disputed piece of property, because there was no certainty the discussions would remain private and not be used to fuel Internet critics.”

What it doesn’t say: For nearly a year, Ben and Nisa tried to get SMF to resolve the dispute through negotiation or formal mediation. During that period, only their closest friends and relatives knew what was going on. In July of this year, SMF brought suit against them in land court. Then and only then did they start talking publicly about the case. The lawyer referred to — Diane Tillotson of the Boston firm Hemenway & Barnes LLP — knows this. She also knows that Judge Sands directed both parties not to speak to the press. One wonders how Mr. Sigelman found out what Ms. Tillotson told Judge Sands.

What the Times says: “Sheriff’s Meadow withdrew an offer to pay husband and wife Ben Ramsey and Nisa Counter $10,000 for land the Island couple bought for $9,000 in the Quenames section of Chilmark. The conservation organization says the lot Ramsey/Counter bought is part of property it owns.”

What it doesn’t say: Before Ben and Nisa bought the land from Ben’s aunt, they went to considerable trouble and expense to verify that this parcel was not part of the so-called Freeman Hancock woodlot, which was donated to SMF in 1973. When land has been in one family for many decades — Hancock ownership in this area goes back to the early nineteenth century — boundary lines get fuzzy and transfers go unrecorded. So there are plenty of clouded titles. Alone among the island’s conservation organizations, SMF has been willing to accept donations of land with clouded titles. Still it was somewhat surprising when, at the first court date in late August, SMF’s lawyers couldn’t locate the disputed parcel on a map.

What the Times says: “A land court judge has ordered all parties not to speak publicly about a case that generated sharp online attacks against the Island’s largest conservation organization, its officers, and lawyer Ron Rappaport of Edgartown.”

They could have put it this way: “A land court judge has ordered all parties not to speak publicly about a case that has generated one-sided, factually distorted coverage by the Martha’s Vineyard Times.

What the Times says: The settlement would have allowed the couple to walk away without a loss on the purchase price and spare Sheriff’s Meadow significant legal fees. SMF yanked the offer after details of private discussions appeared on a website highly critical of the nonprofit, according to court documents filed in the case.”

Are they kidding???: SMF’s offer would have allowed the couple to walk away from their dream of building a house and raising a family on the land. Sorry, I find the offer insulting and Mr. Sigelman’s account of it inexplicable. And — Earth to Sheriff’s Meadow! Earth to Sheriff’s Meadow! — SMF can spare itself “significant legal fees” by agreeing to mediation and/or dropping the suit. Since these legal fees are flowing in the direction of Ms. Tillotson and her firm, one can’t help wondering why Ms. Tillotson is really so dead set against mediation.

The tent, dismantled

Oh yeah, and about that caption: Under a photo of the carpenter’s tent that Ben Ramsey erected on the property, the caption reads: “The couple received a tent permit and erected a shed on the property at the heart of the dispute. The Chilmark zoning officer told them to take it down.” For the record, Ben explained to Chilmark town officials what he was planning to put up on the property. The board of health issued a tent permit — a permit for a temporary structure that would expire at the end of October. Apparently there was some misunderstanding about construction materials: can a tent be made of wood, or does it have to be canvas? The Times has been trying hard to make it look as if Ben were trying to pull a fast one on the town. Trust me, he wasn’t.

Interestingly enough, it was after I posted a comment to the MVTimes website that contained a link to photos of Ben dismantling the tent that I was barred from posting new comments to the site. Shortly after that, all my earlier comments disappeared. The photos proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the structure was temporary. Can’t let readers see that, can we?

Speaking of which — I’m not displeased to note that toward the end of his story Mr. Sigelman quoted and paraphrased at some length from this blog, all properly credited, of course. (They even spelled my name right.) I’m less than thrilled that he didn’t call to verify that the info I posted nearly a month ago was still true — but he probably figured that if he had, I’d ask why I’m banned from posting comments on the MVTimes website. He got that right.

Ms. Tillotson seems to be particularly distressed by blogs and social media. She doesn’t understand how they work. Perhaps she doesn’t realize that this particular blog and the Youth Lots vs. Tax Breaks page on Facebook aren’t the problem: we’re a response to the problem. The problem is one of SMF’s own creation. If SMF were acting honorably, what would there be to criticize? If SMF were acting honorably, it wouldn’t have had to engage Ms. Tillotson to represent it in court.

Nisa Counter and Ben Ramsey are acting honorably. We who’ve been blogging, posting comments, writing letters, and making phone calls in their behalf are doing it on our own time, because we believe it’s the right thing to do.

The earlier chapters:
“Land Grab”
“What’s Up with the M.V. Times?”
“So Long, Tent”
“Has SMF Lost the Plot?”
“Defense Fund Established for Ben & Nisa”
“Turning Point”
“How the Story Ended . . .”
“It Ain’t Over Yet”
“They’d Rather Sue”

Posted in Martha's Vineyard | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Samhain Passes

Samhain is the pagan new year, the cross-quarter day that falls between the fall equinox and the winter solstice. It’s variously pronounced — I say “sah’-wen” — but if you want to keep calling it Halloween or All Hallows’ Eve, that’s fine with me. Some years the seasons slide one into another with no respect for the calendar, but this year Samhain marked a turning point. A nor’easter (aka “a three-day blow”) moved in for the weekend, with rain rain rain and wind wind wind. In its wake we had our first frost of the season. It was 29 F when I headed out to do my laundry Monday morning.

Last T-shirt laundry of 2011

I closed the skylight that was still cracked open and turned my heater on. It’s now set at 60 F. When the sun’s out, my studio apartment gets considerably warmer than that. Nevertheless, we’re now in the season where I wear two layers inside and add a third when I go out. There were at least six T-shirts in Monday’s laundry. I doubt we’ll see them on the line again before April. No longjohns yet, but I’ve had gloves on more than once. My trademark brown Greek fisherman’s cap is spending more time on my head and less on its hook.

A cool snap in mid-September alarmed me: my garden was laden with green cherry tomatoes, and I feared an early frost was imminent. It warmed up, it rained; nearly all the cherries ripened before the first hard frost. My 2011 garden is now officially defunct.

My dinghy garden, all tuckered out

The two tomato plants in pots on my deck didn’t fare nearly as well as their full siblings in the garden. Their first flowers appeared a scant three weeks ago, and the frost caught them with two little cherries maybe half an inch in diameter. The basil went from green to black overnight.

I had a feeling a week ago Friday that I was taking my last outdoor shower of the season. It was in the high thirties that morning. Before leaving for the weekend, I got out the rest of my long pants, longjohns, flannel shirts, and turtlenecks. Shorts, tank tops, and sleeveless dresses went into the box vacated by the cool-weather duds. After I got home, outdoor showers looked more like penance than pleasure, so I moved soap and shampoo inside.

My outdoor shower

This weekend we turned the outdoor water off. I disconnected and drained my garden hose.

The garden isn’t put to bed yet, but its time is coming. Fall has turned the corner. No longer is it harking back toward summer. Winter isn’t here yet, but it’s in the air.

Posted in home | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments

Friends

Politics on Martha’s Vineyard, as in any small town or close-knit neighborhood, are not only local but personal — sometimes intensely personal. It’s not quite true that “everybody knows everybody,” but if you’ve been around a couple of decades or so the degrees of separation are not many. As a recent arrival, I worked as a temporary typesetter then part-time proofreader at the Martha’s Vineyard Times. After a couple of years, I didn’t know everybody, but I sure knew how to spell their names right.

For islanders who’ve been around considerably longer than two decades, it’s not just a matter of knowing everybody; it’s a matter of being related to many of them.

One result of this intricate interconnectedness is a certain circumspection. Speak out on a contentious issue and you’re almost certain to annoy or alienate some of your friends, neighbors, and kinfolk. Is it worth it? you wonder. Will so-and-so ever speak to me again? Will what I say affect my kid in school, my sister’s job, my own employment prospects?

Another result is that when election day approaches and you aren’t up to the minute on the candidates, you’ll pay attention to the preferences of your savvier friends and relatives. Other things being equal, you’ll probably start leaning in their direction.

So a few days ago, when I received an e-mail from an acquaintance taking me to task for “bash[ing] Mark London with such a vengeance” in my blogs about the roundabout, I paid attention. Having been where I’ve been and seen what I’ve seen over the years, I know that my standard for bashing, trashing, and flaming is considerably higher than some people’s. Considered criticism of a person’s politics or actions does not equal bashing. Bashing by definition goes further, often much further, to attacking the person and/or the groups to which the person belongs.

For several years I reviewed Vineyard theater for the Martha’s Vineyard Times. My goal was to say nothing in print about an actor or director that I wouldn’t be willing to say to the person’s face. It’s not a bad standard.

True, I used the word “gag” in the headline I put on Mr. London’s memo to the members and staff of the Martha’s Vineyard Commission (MVC). “Gag” is not a neutral word. I said that my “overboggled mind” was “boggling anew.” Yeah, there’s a little rhetorical flourish in there, but those who’ve followed either this blog or the process itself probably won’t find it excessive.

After reviewing my previous blogs on the subject, I don’t believe I’ve been bashing Mr. London. I do believe that the MVC staff, led by Mr. London, played a key role in moving this project forward with minimal public input. That role, along with the protocols under which the MVC apparently operates, deserves close scrutiny in the months to come. So does the apparent inaction of the MVC itself. It’s not the MVC staff that we’ve elected to oversee island development. The commissioners are supposed to be directing the staff, not the other way round.

My correspondent’s spirited defense of Mr. London boils down to this: my correspondent has known Mr. London and his family for a long time, Mr. London is a good man, Mr. London loves the island, Mr. London has the best of motives.

Did I ever suggest otherwise? Everyone’s the hero of their own story, and we want our friends, colleagues, and kinfolk (at least the ones we’re on speaking terms with) to come off well too. I’m willing to bet that everyone on the Martha’s Vineyard Commission loves Martha’s Vineyard, each in his or her own way, but that doesn’t mean that they agree on what’s good for the island, or even that their opinions are compatible with one another. That’s what politics are about: the jostling, intermingling, and (one hopes) eventual reconciling of contradictory views.

Hang around long enough and just about everyone you know will surprise you one way or the other. It’s never easy to separate the doer from the deed, and the more strongly you feel about someone, the harder it is. A friend makes a dubious call. Someone you think poorly of makes a great save. The mind recoils with a big boingggg but we’ve got to live with it.

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, musing, public life | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

London Tries to Gag MVC

The following memo was sent to all members of the Martha’s Vineyard Commission and the MVC staff late Tuesday afternoon (5:44 pm to be precise) by Mark London, MVC executive director. Nearly all the commissioners are either elected by Vineyard voters or appointed by elected officials. Mr. London is employed by the commission. Mr. London, reliable rumor has it, was guiding — the word “mastermind” has been used — the roundabout project years before the elected commissioners were involved. Now, it seems, he considers himself the judge and the commissioners members of a jury that must be sequestered lest they be contaminated by public opinion. My overboggled mind is boggling anew.

Subject: Reminder – No Ex-Parte Communications re Roundabout

Commissioners,

Since there may be a motion to rescind the decision on the Oak Bluffs Roundabout on November 3, the issue is still pending before the Commission. Therefore, Commissioners should follow all of the ordinary procedures for public hearings and public meetings on pending applications. Ex-parte communications regarding this issue are still prohibited.

 Commissioners should not discuss the issue with each other or with anyone else. The only discussion that may take place is in the presence of other Commissioners with proper notice to the parties and the public and opportunity for all Commissioners to participate in the communication. This includes your participation in public meetings other than Commission meetings.

If you are approached by a member of the public or an elected official, you should politely but firmly refuse to engage in conversation about the matter. You can tell them that the hearing is now closed and it is too late to submit additional information or opinions; should the hearing be reopened, the public will be given notice and people can submit additional materials at that time.

 Also, you should avoid reading additional materials about this issue, including commentary in local newspapers.

 Mark

_____________________________

Mark London
Executive Director
Martha’s Vineyard Commission
508-693-3453 x11

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , | 5 Comments