Politics on Martha’s Vineyard, as in any small town or close-knit neighborhood, are not only local but personal — sometimes intensely personal. It’s not quite true that “everybody knows everybody,” but if you’ve been around a couple of decades or so the degrees of separation are not many. As a recent arrival, I worked as a temporary typesetter then part-time proofreader at the Martha’s Vineyard Times. After a couple of years, I didn’t know everybody, but I sure knew how to spell their names right.

For islanders who’ve been around considerably longer than two decades, it’s not just a matter of knowing everybody; it’s a matter of being related to many of them.

One result of this intricate interconnectedness is a certain circumspection. Speak out on a contentious issue and you’re almost certain to annoy or alienate some of your friends, neighbors, and kinfolk. Is it worth it? you wonder. Will so-and-so ever speak to me again? Will what I say affect my kid in school, my sister’s job, my own employment prospects?

Another result is that when election day approaches and you aren’t up to the minute on the candidates, you’ll pay attention to the preferences of your savvier friends and relatives. Other things being equal, you’ll probably start leaning in their direction.

So a few days ago, when I received an e-mail from an acquaintance taking me to task for “bash[ing] Mark London with such a vengeance” in my blogs about the roundabout, I paid attention. Having been where I’ve been and seen what I’ve seen over the years, I know that my standard for bashing, trashing, and flaming is considerably higher than some people’s. Considered criticism of a person’s politics or actions does not equal bashing. Bashing by definition goes further, often much further, to attacking the person and/or the groups to which the person belongs.

For several years I reviewed Vineyard theater for the Martha’s Vineyard Times. My goal was to say nothing in print about an actor or director that I wouldn’t be willing to say to the person’s face. It’s not a bad standard.

True, I used the word “gag” in the headline I put on Mr. London’s memo to the members and staff of the Martha’s Vineyard Commission (MVC). “Gag” is not a neutral word. I said that my “overboggled mind” was “boggling anew.” Yeah, there’s a little rhetorical flourish in there, but those who’ve followed either this blog or the process itself probably won’t find it excessive.

After reviewing my previous blogs on the subject, I don’t believe I’ve been bashing Mr. London. I do believe that the MVC staff, led by Mr. London, played a key role in moving this project forward with minimal public input. That role, along with the protocols under which the MVC apparently operates, deserves close scrutiny in the months to come. So does the apparent inaction of the MVC itself. It’s not the MVC staff that we’ve elected to oversee island development. The commissioners are supposed to be directing the staff, not the other way round.

My correspondent’s spirited defense of Mr. London boils down to this: my correspondent has known Mr. London and his family for a long time, Mr. London is a good man, Mr. London loves the island, Mr. London has the best of motives.

Did I ever suggest otherwise? Everyone’s the hero of their own story, and we want our friends, colleagues, and kinfolk (at least the ones we’re on speaking terms with) to come off well too. I’m willing to bet that everyone on the Martha’s Vineyard Commission loves Martha’s Vineyard, each in his or her own way, but that doesn’t mean that they agree on what’s good for the island, or even that their opinions are compatible with one another. That’s what politics are about: the jostling, intermingling, and (one hopes) eventual reconciling of contradictory views.

Hang around long enough and just about everyone you know will surprise you one way or the other. It’s never easy to separate the doer from the deed, and the more strongly you feel about someone, the harder it is. A friend makes a dubious call. Someone you think poorly of makes a great save. The mind recoils with a big boingggg but we’ve got to live with it.

About Susanna J. Sturgis

Susanna edits for a living, writes to survive, and has been preoccupied with electoral politics since 2016. She just started a blog about her vintage T-shirt collection: "The T-Shirt Chronicles." Her other blogs include "From the Seasonally Occupied Territories," about being a year-round resident of Martha's Vineyard, and "Write Through It," about writing, editing, and how to keep going.
This entry was posted in Martha's Vineyard, musing, public life and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Friends

  1. Susanna –

    Great post. I encourage you to remain true to your convictions, for no matter what side of an issue one takes, surely there will be someone with an opinion contrary to yours. And with respect to alienating others? I wouldn’t give it a second thought. If your facts are accurate, and not simply blatant conjecture, and if you can intelligently defend a particular position, then have at it! The U.S. Constitution grants all citizens the right to the freedom of speech and expression. Anyone not willing to concede the truth about an issue is not worth the expediture of the time or energy it takes to engage them.

    Often times, I resort to a belief that I’ve adopted over the years, and that is: ‘What you think of me is none of my business’. And its worked for me!



  2. susan robinson says:

    Beautiful exploration of a process we all struggle with.


  3. Sara Crafts says:

    Good on you, Susanna — there’s sure a fine line between attacking someone’s politics/behavior and attacking them personally. Who knew that simple descecration of the landscape and concomitant spending of an obscene amount of money all in the name of (1) safety or (2) expedience could have become such a problem? Certainly not the OB Selectmen or the MVC. Do you think either of those entities would not have for it, had they seen the future? On a happier note, I do see a book in the future of this one …


  4. If people demand to have their own opinion, then they must live with the fact that you also have that right.


    • Dan Waters says:

      I agree. Susanna, you need offer no more vigorous a response than that you yourself are a good woman, you love the Island, and you have the best of motives. You also have gone considerably out of your way to make sure of your facts before drawing conclusions, and you have nothing to gain (and arguably something to risk) by publishing them. MVC defenders should worry less about personalities, and do more to prove that they’re going the extra mile to keep the process open, transparent, and inclusive.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.