April License Plate Report

April’s catch: Kansas, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee.

Finally Ohio shows up! And Kentucky always looks lonely on the map until I can color in neighbor Tennessee to the south. Still need Delaware and Georgia to finish off the East Coast. Maybe May will complete that green band across the nation’s midsection: Utah and Missouri would be nice.

If you think I’ve gone off my rocker, check out “My License Plate Fetish.” And if you see North Dakota on a Vineyard road, call me. I’m not kidding. I’m in the book.

Here’s what the map looked like when April turned into May:

Posted in license plates, Martha's Vineyard | Tagged | 5 Comments

Those Signs

In the front field at Fred Fisher's, State Road, West Tisbury. Sign says: "Nothing is perfect but you come close."

If you live on the Vineyard, you’ve seen the signs. If you don’t, here’s the Martha’s Vineyard Times story about them. The short version is that the signs are part of an art installation by psychotherapist-artist Julia Kidd. Many of the signs are planted in the ground and can be seen from the roadside. One is a banner hanging over Edgartown’s Main Street; another is displayed on the schooner Shenandoah. At least two signs are indoors, one at the West Tisbury library and one in the high school cafeteria. Perhaps most ingenious are the ones being displayed on-screen before the feature film at several island movie theaters.

To say that the signs have created a stir is an understatement. Everybody seems to be talking about them, and some of the talk is passionate. This is a good sign. Some people insist that the installation isn’t “art.” I think it is. It’s an antidote to the notion that art is what reposes in museums for the passive admiration of reverent visitors. Julia Kidd had a vision, and she’s managed to realize that vision against daunting odds: anyone who’s ever tried to accomplish anything on Martha’s Vineyard has to marvel at her persistence and courage in dealing with numerous town boards, private individuals, and public institutions.

At the Tashmoo Overlook

In any case, “Is it art?” is a dead-end question. The more interesting questions include “What kind of art is it?,” “What is the artist trying to say?,” and “How do I respond to it, and why?”

Art comes in myriad varieties: confusing, opaque, accessible, political, abstract, and so on and on. It’s often several things at once. I want art to deepen my understanding, expand my vision, show me life from a different angle — in short, I want it to unsettle me. Maybe it’ll disturb my sleep. Maybe it’ll make me get up and dance. Maybe it’ll do both.

Once I acknowledge the vision and admire the persistence that went into this installation, I have to admit that it’s cloying and annoying and it pisses me off. These signs are handsome and well made, but they’d be at home anywhere: on a suburban golf course, alongside an interstate. The ones I’ve seen so far sit uneasily on the landscape, sharp-angled against the contours of the land — as alien as the mega-mansions we profess to despise though far more modest. They make me wonder if the entire island is on Prozac.

What bugs me most about this art are the words. I’m a writer by avocation, an editor by trade: I have fun with words, but I also take them seriously.

Regardless of the artist’s intent, these words come across as insipid because they’re used all the time, to sell stuff, to manipulate people into buying stuff, to manipulate people into bed, and maybe to manipulate people into paying their therapy bills. Which makes me wonder: What is the artist trying to manipulate me into, and why do some people consider these messages “positive” and “inspirational”? My hunch is that at least in part it’s because they go down so easy. They don’t unsettle anything. They’re like, well, Prozac.

Note that these messages are all in the first-person and second-person singular: I and you. Yes, the English “you” is both singular and plural; “thou” died out of colloquial usage a long time ago. Perhaps the artist did have a plural you in mind, even in such messages as “You are a bright idea” (which hangs in the high school cafeteria). But I doubt it.

A Tisbury police car was overseeing the overlook when Trav and I visited late last Thursday afternoon.

Imagine, if you will, heading up-island on State Road and spotting a sign that said “Don’t mourn — organize!” or “We shall overcome.” These messages are positive, inspirational — and plural. “Aha,” you object, “but they’re also political.” And Julia Kidd’s installation isn’t?? Of course it is. If it weren’t, she would have stuck these messages up on her medicine cabinet, her fridge, or the walls of her office. She acknowledges implicitly that Martha’s Vineyard has problems. The solution, she seems to be saying, or at least the next step, is love and improved self-esteem.

Nothing wrong with love and self-esteem, of course. But the notion that they can be packaged and doled out on signs and in seminars is a tad problematic — and, for those privileged enough to not want their boats rocked, self-serving. The civil rights movement did wonders for the self-esteem of millions of African Americans, and who can deny that love was a big part of it? It rocked boats in a big way, however, and there’s a reason it wasn’t started by white people.

“My whole feeling about the whole project is you’re either going to come from a place of faith and love or you’re going to come from a place of fear,” Ms. Kidd was quoted in the M.V. Times as saying. “And that’s a lot of what came up for people, is either one or the other.”

Really? Ms. Kidd’s dichotomy greatly oversimplifies the matter, not least because faith, love, and fear regularly manage to coexist in human motivation. It also ignores Vineyard history. Our history, like that of the country, the continent, and the whole planet, is one of natives showing hospitality to new arrivals and then being steamrollered by them. Faith and love are often misplaced, and fear — or at least skepticism — is often warranted.

The day-to-day lives of working Vineyarders, Vineyarders of modest means, are heavily shaped by forces imposed on us from without. It’s always been so, but once upon a time the most decisive forces were beyond human control: weather and the sea. These days the forces are mostly human. Many of us don’t believe we have much control over our lives — because we don’t have much control over our lives, at least not as individuals. What if we organized, the way the civil rights movement organized? What if we had faith in our own collective power?

Love would be singing in the trees, and our self-esteem might shoot off the charts.

P.S. For a master sign-maker’s take on the signs, check out “You Messages in Eleven Places” by Tom Hodgson, proprietor of TheTomPostPile. Funny thing, there was a cop car on the overlook when Tom went there too.

C'mon, Trav -- you know it's not about me. It's about the string cheese.

 

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, outdoors | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Ecology

Earlier today someone posted to Facebook’s MV Stuff 4 Sale page on behalf of some friends of hers: a couple with two young children who’ve just been kicked out of their house by their landlord, who’s decided he wants to live there this summer. (If you have any leads, let me know and I’ll pass them on to this woman.)

I was in a similar situation exactly 10 years ago: the terminally self-absorbed landlady from whom I was renting two rooms decided she wanted to make these rooms available to a guy who was going to re-roof her house in lieu of rent. Finding an affordable year-round rental in mid-spring is not easy, and to make it more challenging I had Rhodry. “No pets” is common in rental ads. But the miracle occurred: I found a place in Vineyard Haven, and Rhodry and I moved on June 1.

I later learned that the roofer reneged and landlady was left with rentless rooms and no new roof. Awww . . .

Old microwave

My new digs had been vacated by the death of their previous occupant, who was a few years older than I was then, a few years younger than I am now. His brother and sister-in-law didn’t need his stuff, so I bought a bunch of it for cheap, including a hot plate, a toaster oven, and a microwave. These were utter necessities because this wasn’t a legal apartment, and the way a non-legal apartment stays just this side of the law (and the building inspector) is by not having a stove.

The microwave and the toaster oven came with me when I moved to my current (legal) apartment a little over five years ago. Since I had a real kitchen, which is to say a stove, the hot plate went to the thrift shop. In recent months, the microwave’s number pad has gotten a little funky: the 2, the 8, and the 0 faltered and then stopped working entirely. The oven itself, however, was working fine. I could work around the funky numbers.

A week or so ago I was visiting with my friend Shirley, who recently moved to a new house. She was looking forward to the arrival of her new microwave, not least because it would be installed above her conventional oven and thus free up the counter space currently occupied by her old microwave. She said I could have the old one if I wanted it. You bet I did.

"New" microwave in its little nook. Note dog biscuits on top and to the left. On the right is the toaster oven I purchased from the family of the dead former tenant of my apartment before this one.

I picked it up on Wednesday. It fit neatly into the corner occupied by the old one, and after I plugged it in I was duly impressed: it walked me through setting the clock. Ten years ago I’d been so flummoxed trying to set the time on my old/new microwave that I’d had to order a copy of the manual to figure it out.

Yesterday I posted a photo of the old microwave to MV Stuff 4 Sale: “Free microwave. Heats fine. 2, 8, and 0 buttons don’t work.” Within a few hours I had a taker. His girlfriend picked it up today.

So I’m sitting here at my laptop counting up the things within eyeshot that came from somewhere else. The chair-side worktable was one of the items I bought from dead former tenant’s family; it used to be a TV/VCR caddy. Travvy’s travel crate I got off eBay. A friend found my camp chair at the Dumptique (aka the recycling shed at the West Tisbury dump). My computer desk was another MV Stuff 4 Sale find: I wrote about it in “Saved by a Desk” in early March. And so on.

I’ve seen other people wearing clothes I donated to the Dumptique or the thrift shop. I’m sure other Vineyarders have recognized the various sweaters and jackets I wear out and about, though so far no one’s come up to me and said so. My “new” is someone else’s “old”; my “old” is someone else’s “new.” In this age of planned obsolescence, some things last long enough to have several lives. I like it.

Posted in home, Martha's Vineyard | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Do You Hear What I Hear?

One of the signs that hung in front of Tilton Rentall (at the blinker) during election week in Oak Bluffs -- the town that didn't get to participate in the non-binding referendum.

So the results are in on the roundabout referendum from four of the five towns whose selectmen gave voters a chance to express their opinion. Aquinnah doesn’t vote till May 9. Here’s the tally so far:

Edgartown: 508 NO ROUNDABOUT, 171 yes, 27 blanks — 72% against

West Tisbury: 505 no, 175 yes, 34 blanks — 71% against

Tisbury: 686 no, 215 yes, 25 blanks — 74% against

Chilmark: 180 no, 65 yes, 16 blanks — 69% against

Chilmark, which voted yesterday, is the home of Chris Murphy, the Martha’s Vineyard Commission chair who twice broke an MVC deadlock in favor of the roundabout. Too bad, Chris: there’s no way to break a landslide!

Thanks to its roundabout-boosting selectmen, Oak Bluffs didn’t get to vote on the issue. Anyone want to hazard a guess what the tally would have been if they had?

Senator Wolf, Representative Madden, Governor Patrick: Are you listening?

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rally Off-Island

Travvy’s fans have reminded me that I haven’t written much about him lately. They’re right. I’ve written a fair amount about dogs who kill chickens (and the humans who let them down) and dog policy on Lambert’s Cove Beach, but I haven’t written much about Travvy. This one’s for him.

Trav and I finished our CRO Level 2 title on April 15. Here’s the boy with his spiffy new title ribbon.

This past weekend we went up to Westford, Mass. (just this side of Lowell — almost all the way to New Hampshire), for our first APDT Rally trial of 2012. For a brief description of Rally — aka Rally Obedience, or Rally-O — see “Rally at the Tennis Court.” Over the winter we’ve been honing our old skills, developing new ones, and advancing in Cyber Rally-O (CRO). CRO offers training challenges a-plenty, but you don’t have to go anywhere: you video your run and upload it to YouTube, where the judge studies it carefully then tells you if you’ve Qed (qualified) or not.

With APDT (that stands for the sponsoring organization, the Association of Pet Dog Trainers) Rally, the challenges begin long before you and your partner enter the ring. Ferry reservations. Motel reservations. Packing the car. Highway driving. Finding first the motel and then the venue where the trial is being held. I still navigate the old way, with maps and printed directions, but I’d been to both places before so this wasn’t a hassle.

Navigate is what you do with a Rally course. A typical APDT Rally course comprises 18 to 20 signs, each requiring the team to perform a particular exercise. The signs are numbered, and have to be performed in the correct order. No GPS devices are allowed, and most dogs don’t count sign reading among their skills, so the handler has to focus on the numbers, the signs, and the correct execution of the exercise, all the while being excruciatingly aware of her canine partner’s mental state. At a trial the distractions are many: other dogs, people, an unfamiliar setting, the general level of stress and excitement.

Our haul from last weekend: 6 Qs, 5 placements, 1 perfect score.

Over the weekend, Trav and I entered four Level 1 classes and four Level 2. In Level 1, the dog is on-leash. The leash is supposed to hang loose, and you lose points whenever it gets tight, but the leash is there. When you get to Level 2, you realize what a difference this makes. Level 2 is off-leash, and some of the exercises require the handler to move some distance from the dog. Trav is easily distracted, and he’s only fair-to-middling on the impulse control scale.

He’s also an Alaskan malamute, which is no one’s idea of the ideal breed to do obedience with. When the leash comes off, my stress level goes up. No surprise then that we Qed in all our Level 1 runs, all with very respectable scores (including a 210 — perfect score!)  but only two of our Level 2s. One of the NQs was due to Idiot Handler Error — I missed a sign.

The other — well, APDT Rally includes an exercise, the off-set figure 8, that requires the dog to heel, off-leash, a figure 8 among four food bowls that have (dry) dog food in them. Trav’s prey drive is high, his impulse control low, and he’s also a resource guarder. This means he’ll usually growl when I try to take something away from him, and in high-stress situations he may snarl or even snap. The latter can get you thrown out of Rally for good. The risk isn’t worth it. The Dreaded Food Bowls showed up in our last Level 2 course. I asked the judge if we could take an NQ and do the course on-leash as a training run. She said yes. As soon as Trav realized the food bowls were there, it was clear that the leash was the only thing preventing him from making a beeline for them. The judge, watching, said, “You know your dog.” That I do.

Below you’ll find two fairly typical Rally courses, one for Level 1, one for Level 2.

APDT Rally Level 1 course

The names of the exercises are at right. The crosses in exercise #4 represent cones: the team weaves through them without knocking any of them over. In exercise #12, the one on the left that looks like a spindly tree, the team halts, then takes one step forward, then two steps forward, then three steps forward, with the dog sitting at each halt. Before each class, the handlers get to walk the course without their dogs. This looks pretty funny from outside the ring, because most of us walk with “air dogs” on our left, trying to gauge how much room we need to allow for each maneuver.

APDT Rally Level 2 course

The object on the right (exercise #5) that looks like either a dirty Q-tip or a skinny barbell is a jump. There are jumps in Level 2 and Level 3. The crosses on the left are, once again, cones, this time arranged for “spiral right, dog outside” (exercise #1). We call this the paper clip because that’s what the pattern looks like: first you heel around all three cones, then you heel around the first two, then you heel around the first one.

Dog training is fascinating and challenging in all the best ways, and I thank Travvy for introducing me to it and Rally-O.

Posted in dogs | Tagged , , , | 9 Comments

Suckered

Remember the two young Akitas who got into such trouble in West Tisbury that, in great exasperation with the irresponsibility of their owners, the selectmen sentenced them to die?

A compromise was reached: The death sentence would be lifted if the irresponsible owners agreed to let the dogs be rehomed. The agreement further stipulated that the dogs could not be rehomed with either of the current owners, Taggart Young and Anna Bolotovsky, or their families and that the dogs could not return to Martha’s Vineyard. On Friday, March 2, the dogs, Zion and Sensi, were turned over to the Lexus Project.

Guess what? According to a source I consider reliable, the two dogs are back with the original owners and living with Anna’s family in Newton.

Correction: I misunderstood my source on this incident. It took place before the dogs were turned over to the Lexus Project. As far as I know, neither dog has come back to the island since then. More, on at least one occasion Tag has brought Sensi to work with him. On that particular occasion, Sensi disappeared from the job site. After a frantic search she was found — and Tag’s response was, it seems, to punish her for running off.

Any half-savvy dog owner knows that this doesn’t teach the dog not to run off. It teaches the dog not to come back.

On March 11 I posted “Doomsdog Coda,” reporting that the dogs had been turned over to Lexus, expressing my reservations about the arrangement, and hoping for the best. I mentioned that the day before I had e-mailed Robin Mittasch, co-principal of the Lexus Project, to ask if she had any update about the two dogs. She responded the same day: “They are decompressing and doing well in a foster home. That’s all the news we have.”

Were they already back in Tag and Anna’s hands by then? I don’t know.

The whole incident makes me a little sick. Sensi and Zion are back in the same incapable hands.

If I knew for an absolute fact that Sensi or Zion was on the island, would I call the police, the animal control officer, or the board of selectmen? Not without a guarantee that the dog(s) (a) wouldn’t be killed, and (b) would be turned over to BEAR or an equally competent rescue organization.

What’s most sickening, though, is that this was entirely, 100% preventable. A bona fide Akita rescue group, Big East Akita Rescue (BEAR), was ready and able to take charge of Sensi and Zion, foster them, evaluate them, and find them suitable new homes. Instead, the town let Young and Bolotovsky and their lawyer choose the Lexus Project as an intermediary — even though Lexus is a legal defense group, not a rescue, and it seemed reluctant to establish contact with BEAR. Two of us communicated all this information to two of the three selectmen and to the town administrator, who was charged with doing the research and making the arrangements.

The upshot is that the town got suckered: suckered by Young and Bolotovsky, suckered by their lawyer (one Jonathan Stone Rankin of Framingham, who specializes in “animal law”), suckered by the Lexus Project. At the feel-good meeting where the “compromise” was agreed on, the town even excused Young and Bolotovsky from paying the town’s legal fees in the case.

My biggest hope is that the next dog that gets in trouble in West Tisbury won’t have to pay for the town’s gullibility. And if you’re moved to donate money to an animal-welfare group, there are plenty of alternatives out there more worthy than the Lexus Project.

Posted in dogs, public life | Tagged , , , | 12 Comments

April Is a Taxing Month

O blessed 2012! Blessed because April 15 fell on a Sunday, and Monday the 16th was Emancipation Day in D.C., where the federal government lives, and Patriots Day in Massachusetts, where I live. This means that neither of my returns had to be postmarked till today. Guess what? They haven’t been postmarked yet.

Doing my taxes is always a miserable business. I start procrastinating when my 1099s arrive at the end of January, and generally don’t actually do them till around April 13. This year it was April 15.

Raw materials spread out on my bread-kneading table. Not pictured: Previous year's returns are spread out on the floor.

As a self-employed person, I have zero incentive to do my taxes early. Incentive = refund, and I haven’t received a refund since about 1980. I pay what are euphemistically called “quarterlies”: estimated tax for the current year. Quarterlies are indeed due in four installments, but the quarters are not created equal: the due dates are April 15, June 15, September 15, and January 15.

You see the problem with this? The first quarterly payment is due the same day you’re writing a check for what you still owe on last year’s tax. The latter deadline is non-negotiable: if you owe them money, they expect to find a check in your return — unless you file for an extension, in which case you’re still supposed to come up with the amount you think you’ll owe. But I discovered early in my freelancing career that quarterly deadlines are more forgiving. Much more forgiving: as long as you’re pretty well paid up by April 15, they don’t seem to care.

Before I even start, all my expenditures for the past year have to be entered in Quicken. This provides yet another reason to procrastinate. My checkbook is usually within a month of up-to-date, but when I sat down around April 1, 2012, with a thick sheaf of credit card statements, the most recent posting was dated February 2011. Plenty of my credit card purchases are work-related, so I can’t fill out Schedule C till I know what they are. Yes, I do know that I could download bank and credit card statements directly into Quicken, but my illusion that I have some control over my finances depends on entering my transactions manually.

Anxiety and dread rarely darken my doorstep, but in the run-up to Tax Day they’re my constant, ever more insistent companions. Cause #1: When I add up the income and subtract the expenses, will I still qualify for Commonwealth Care? I lived more than 20 years with either no insurance or major medical that never did me any good, so you’d think losing my coverage would be no big deal, but it is, it is. In 2008 I had cataract surgery with insurance. In 2004 I had two retina reattachment surgeries without. The latter meant not only two big out-of-pocket expenses but a wrangle with the anesthesiologist’s employer that went on for more than a year. It sucked.

I’m healthy, I’m less than five years away from Medicare — but nevertheless insured is better than uninsured,  and most years I come in pretty close to the cutoff. If you’re under the cutoff, you qualify. If you’re over, you don’t, even though you can’t begin to afford what’s available commercially to single self-employed people. For this reason, Massachusetts won’t fine you if you aren’t covered, but like I said, insured is better than uninsured. The new federal plan seems to have a similar gap.

Thinking about this for too long makes me really, really angry. I manage not to think about it too much when I’m not putting off doing my taxes. Is this a pro or a con for procrastination? Hmmm . . .

The other source of anxiety and dread is the Form 1040 instruction book. I’m a word person. I’ve been making my living in the word trades for 35 years. Of all the English-language works I’ve encountered over the years, the Form 1040 book is hands-down the most incomprehensible. This is humiliating. The IRS keeps telling us that most people should be able to prepare their own taxes. You think? If a highly skilled native speaker of English can’t figure out the instructions, what chance does a person with merely average skills have?

Once again, if I think too hard about who benefits most from the opaque instructions and the byzantine tax code, my ordinarily normal blood pressure starts to rise.

Long time ago I figured out the obvious solution: Don’t read the instructions. I read the “what’s new” section and then pretty much fill out the forms the way I did the previous year.

This year the story has a happy ending: I overpaid the feds by $52 and the commonwealth by $13. What this means is that I’ve already written my first-quarterly estimated check to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue. The U.S. Treasury might actually get its first installment by the end of the month. I hope nobody faints from the shock.

Done! The beer stein is empty. The missing envelope is my first-quarterly payment to the feds. At the moment I don't have an extra $1,400 hanging around. Soon, though . . .

Posted in home, work | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Three Elections Down

Election day has come and gone in West Tisbury, Edgartown, and Oak Bluffs. I was off-island most of the day, taking a friend to a medical appointment in Falmouth and getting Malvina Forester serviced in Bourne. West Tiz did a fine job in my absence. I voted after I got home. The car I drove to the polls was much cleaner than the car I left the island in: Atlantic Subaru offers a complimentary car wash when you come in for servicing. You bet I took advantage of it.

Homemade (by me) sign in front of the Emergency Services Building, where my town votes.

Both West Tisbury and Edgartown voted resoundingly against the roundabout. In WT, the nays numbered 505 and the ayes 175, out of 718 voting: 70.3% no, 24.3% yes, 5.3% blank. In Edgartown the figures were similar: 508 nay and 171 aye, out of 706 voting. Percentages work out to 72% nay, 24.2% aye, and 3.8% blank.

The West Tisbury library’s expansion project cleared its last hurdle as we voted for the Prop 2.5 debt exclusion (you’re going to have to ask either the library trustees or town accountant Bruce Stone to explain the difference between this and an override) necessary to fund the town’s share of the cost. The landslide vote, 556-138, was a fitting tribute to the hard and smart work of all involved.

Contrary to some predictions, Question 2 passed handily, by a 2.5 to 1 margin. Now restaurants that seat at least 50 people can apply for a license to serve beer and wine with meals, and nonprofits can apply for one-day licenses to serve beer and wine at their events. Nonprofits have been doing this for years, but no one realized it was illegal. Now it’s legal. Does this make West Tisbury the island’s third “wet” town? Well — we’re just talking beer and wine here, not cocktails or other hard liquor. We’ll still be traveling to Oak Bluffs and Edgartown for the hard stuff, and for any booze we want to consume at home. I doubt we’ll be bellying up to the bar in my town any time soon.

About Oak Bluffs — well, as noted previously in this blog, Oak Bluffs residents were denied the opportunity to express their opinions about the roundabout on a secret ballot, largely through the machinations of their selectmen. The ringleaders, Greg Coogan and Kathy Burton, were both handily re-elected yesterday. This is not as depressing, or as significant, as it might seem at first glance, because their only opponent was a former selectman whose main virtue was that he was neither Coogan nor Burton. OB’s political problems run deep, and one glaring symptom is that when competent people are elected to public office they’re either sucked into the existing morass or wear themselves out shoveling shit against the tide — while being treated like shit by their fellow officeholders.

The roundabout was on Tuesday’s town meeting warrant, a clever ploy by the selectmen. It came up at the end of a long meeting and was rushed through by both the moderator and the lateness of the hour: after no discussion, and on a voice vote, town meeting voted in favor of the roundabout. Very few people were fooled by this, and those who were almost certainly wanted to be fooled. If Tisbury, Chilmark, and Aquinnah follow the lead of Edgartown and West Tisbury by turning in comparable 70+% majorities against the roundabout, the fooled are going to look even more foolish.

Little sign at the end of my road

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Annual Town Meeting

West Tisbury voters check in.

Last night was West Tisbury’s annual town meeting (ATM means more than automated teller machine around here). As usual the school gym was packed. Even with two entrances, each staffed by two people checking townsfolk against the voting rolls, we were still pouring in at 7:15 for a meeting that was supposed to start at 7:00.

Ginny Jones and Tony Rezendes check us in. We don't even have to give our names: they know who we are.

I had poured in uncharacteristically early. My excuse is that I live five minutes’ walk away from the school. This gave me time to kibitz with friends and grab a seat near the front. Outside, the Cape Light Compact people were passing out energy-efficient lightbulbs. After ascertaining that they were free, I took one.

After the Pledge of Allegiance (which I didn’t say, even though it was led by a couple of adorable Cub Scouts), our poet laureate, Fan Ogilvie, read her poem about the Liberty Oak. If you ever drive down State Road, you know this tree and understand why people write poems about it. West Tisbury is probably unusual in having a poet laureate, but that’s the kind of town it is, or thinks it is, or thinks it wants to be. Quite a few decades back it changed the name of a road known as Cowplop Lane to Music Street. After that it’s no big step to laureate a poet or two.

The late John Mayhew (left) at the rededication of the Veterans Memoral, Veterans Day 2011. Also honored on this occasion were Nelson Bryant and Clifton Athearn.

Moderator Pat Gregory then read out the names of West Tisbury residents who had died in the previous year. One of them was nonagenarian John Mayhew, island native, lifelong town resident, and World War II vet. Mr. Mayhew’s last public appearance was on Veterans Day, at the rededication of the Veterans Memorial after its relocation to Town Hall from the triangle intersection of State Road and the Edgartown Road. A photo of the event graced the cover of the 2011 Annual Report.

Next on the agenda were reports of several boards and committees. Only a few reports were given orally; detailed accounts of the year just passed appear in the Annual Report. But a listener can’t help marveling at how many people are involved in the workings of this small town, many of them as volunteers. For the elected officials who do receive a stipend, the money doesn’t come close to compensating them for the time they put in — which is why so many of them are either retired or not encumbered by growing children.

Bruce Stone, town accountant, talks about debt service. Behind him is moderator Pat Gregory.

The array of subjects covered is daunting, and so is the expertise that my fellow citizens bring to and develop while doing the town’s business.

A stellar example of volunteers working over several years to make something big happen came to fruition last night: we voted overwhelmingly — 300-something to 6 — to go ahead with the renovation and expansion of the West Tisbury Free Public Library. The library trustees, the building committee, the library staff, and the library’s “friends” group have been at this for years. They applied for and won a highly competitive state grant that will cover about half the cost. Half of the rest has been pledged by private donors, and last night town meeting voted to pay for the rest. A burst of applause, accompanied by a few hoots and hollers, greeted the vote. A key factor here was how hard the project’s supporters worked to let townsfolk know what was going on and solicit input from all segments of the community.

Even the most attentive citizen’s attention occasionally wanders, however, and mine went seriously AWOL during the interminable discussion about proposed amendments to the town’s building code and its zoning bylaws. I’d brought my Nook: why not use this opportunity to catch up with my Scrabble games on Facebook! I logged on to the school’s wi-fi, no problem — then discovered that access to Facebook was blocked. Even for adults. Uh-oh.

As an editor, I was particularly fascinated — not to mention simultaneously annoyed and bored — by the welter of amendments, amendments to amendments, withdrawals of amendments, and rescission of amendments that followed the reading of Article 15. The article was so sloppily written that its purpose wasn’t clear, and the amendments proposed before the purpose was made clear by the committee sponsoring it would have made a serious mess. Why wasn’t this unclarity caught by any of the several people who must have reviewed it before the warrant was finalized? Is there an editor in the house?

Toward the end of the four-hour-long meeting, when everyone was fading fast, I was awake enough to note that Article 32, a fairly routine matter, asked the town “to Appropriate the sum of One Hundred Four Dollars ($104,400) . . .” Is there a proofreader in the house? Well, yeah: I climbed over my neighbor to reach the nearest mike and call the chair’s attention to this and it was duly corrected.

This morning I learned from the Martha’s Vineyard Times that the nice neighbor I climbed over en route to the mike was the writer Geraldine Brooks. She’s Famous. As I often say, I don’t get out much. She spoke in favor of allowing dogs on Lambert’s Cove Beach, which was the next-to-last article on the long warrant. See “Dogs on the Beach” for a discussion of the issues. That post includes a link to my piece about last November’s special town meeting, at which we voted narrowly to ban dogs from the beach between June 15 and September 15. When a vote’s that close, it’s a good bet that the subject is going to come up again. When dogs are involved, it’s a sure thing.

So Article 40 asked the town to rescind the ban.  The ad hoc group that petitioned for the rescission wisely moved from the floor that the question be divided in two. The first asked to rescind the ban between 7 and 10 a.m. The second asked to rescind the after-hours ban, from 6:30 to 9 p.m. The group is working on a plan that will pay someone to supervise dog and dog owner behavior during the hours that dogs are allowed. They’re not sure they’ll be able to raise enough money to cover the early evening hours, which is when people who like to come picnic and watch the sunset do not like sharing their supper or their solitude with loose dogs.

The morning ban was rescinded; the evening ban was left in place. I voted for both rescissions, even though Travvy and I are not beachgoers and even though I don’t have much faith in the common sense or responsibility of many of my fellow dog owners. I don’t have much faith in the Parks and Recreation Committee, either; it supervises the beach and other public recreation areas and seems all too susceptible to fearmongering and worse-case-scenario arguments. For plenty of us, “recreation” involves our dogs at least some of the time, but Parks & Rec persists in seeing us as their adversaries rather than part of their constituency.

The sovereign citizens of West Tisbury

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Iceberg Cometh

Town meeting season starts next week on Martha’s Vineyard. Edgartown, Oak Bluffs, Tisbury, and West Tisbury all hold their annual town meetings on Tuesday the 10th. In Edgartown, Oak Bluffs, and West Tisbury, elections take place two days later, on the 12th (Tisbury doesn’t vote till the 24th).

On April 12, the citizens of Edgartown and West Tisbury will get to vote aye or nay in a non-binding referendum on the proposed roundabout. Not so, as discussed earlier in this blog, the citizens of Oak Bluffs. They will, however, get to express an opinion at their annual town meeting if they stay up late enough.

The Oak Bluffs selectmen clearly did not want the town’s people to vote on the roundabout. Why not? The best theory I’ve heard yet is that selectmen Greg Coogan and Kathy Burton, both diehard roundabout boosters, are up for re-election and the last thing they wanted was a horde of anti-roundabouters showing up at the polls and voting one of them out of office. (Former selectman Roger Wey is the only other candidate; two of the three will get elected.)

Thursday, April 12, is the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic.

Coogan and Burton are running on the slogan “Stay the Course.” Sandra Lippens, proprietor of Tilton Rentall, put two and two together and came up with the sign on the right.

Tilton Rentall is located at the blinker intersection. Sandra has been fighting the roundabout since the idea first surfaced in the early 2000s. The following signs have just appeared on Tilton’s perimeter fence, clearly readable from the Edgartown–Vineyard Haven Road.

From right: “Finally, a democratic process for almost the entire island.” “We’re tired of arrogance and abuse of power at all levels.” “Do you want a roundabout here? Please please VOTE.

Election dates for the six island towns. Oak Bluffs is the only one that won’t get to vote in the non-binding referendum on the roundabout.

On the right, a call for Oak Bluffs voters to attend their town meeting. On the left: “This is your island. You ultimately pay the freight.”

“Governor Patrick, please stop the bulldozers and redirect the money to social services/education” . . . Burma-Shave.

This one is just around the corner. Sandra wrote the copy; the signs were created by her artistically talented staff. I can’t find a single typo in any of them. Can a movement of Vineyarders whose signs are spelled correctly possibly fail?

Posted in Martha's Vineyard, public life | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments